| 24 May 2026 |
André Lima | Why are there teams with no members though? Like systemd, GNOME, and many others? | 16:01:29 |
André Lima | * | 16:01:34 |
winston | yeah I saw that, I assumed I have to get added to https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/teams/gnome | 16:01:42 |
winston | I think its an abstraction so you can @ teams instead of each member individually | 16:02:09 |
winston | for reviews etc | 16:02:15 |
emily | those are in github-teams.json. it's confusing. the workflow is not very good. I'm not super happy about it :/ | 16:04:29 |
emily | I preferred when changes to teams always went through a GitHub PR workflow, because that's the standard we use for everything… pinging maintainers out of band to do it and then it goes in a batch update PR is weird | 16:05:02 |
emily | keeping it in sync with GitHub is good but it would be nice if it worked the other way around (put up PR, it gets blocked by CI until the GitHub change is effected) | 16:05:21 |
winston | ah I see, and changes to that JSON will then sync people on github? | 16:06:12 |
emily | well, that part could still be manual | 16:06:20 |
emily | I think you can do it now by opening a PR to github-teams.json and pinging the team, and then a maintainer can add you | 16:06:30 |
emily | IIRC that's not the flow you're "meant" to do with the new system but it's the only one that makes sense to me :P | 16:06:40 |
winston | gotcha, I'll do that :)
definitely wanna help out with GNOME 51 so we won't have to rush it as hard | 16:07:03 |
André Lima | Oh, thanks for letting me know haha it is a bit confusing, yeah | 16:07:06 |
André Lima | *
https://matrix.to/#/!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org/$UdilqMMjK6YQBd-jF2VbQuZUkyq3LW9WJ28BpOp5tLc?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=tchncs.de
Oh, thanks for letting me know haha it is a bit confusing, yeah
| 16:07:38 |
André Lima | *
https://matrix.to/#/!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org/$UdilqMMjK6YQBd-jF2VbQuZUkyq3LW9WJ28BpOp5tLc?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=tchncs.de
Oh, thanks for letting me know haha it is a bit confusing, yeah
| 16:07:49 |
| 25 May 2026 |
| Tim changed their profile picture. | 19:14:32 |
| 28 May 2026 |
winston | I just finished testing https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/523948 on my hardware and it seems to work for fine me, I'd appreciate if anyone else could try it with other DEs | 16:56:27 |
winston | I should add a VM test too but I haven't come up with a useful one yet | 16:58:14 |
| 30 May 2026 |
winston | yay just had another GDM issue come up which I hadn't encountered before https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/525919 | 14:13:10 |
| 2 Jun 2026 |
| axw joined the room. | 21:06:18 |
| 3 Jun 2026 |
| Yves (she/they) changed their profile picture. | 18:27:38 |
| 4 Jun 2026 |
| Echo changed their profile picture. | 04:23:39 |
| 5 Jun 2026 |
@mcnesium:matrix.org | I am on nixos-unstable with gnome. just did nh os boot to update first time since recent branch-off. after rebooting I log in my user with the gdm login screen, but instead of taking me to my gnome session, it keeps returning to the gdm login screen. what is going on? is this a known issue? how can I debug and fix it? | 13:47:28 |
@mcnesium:matrix.org | in the journal it says
Jun 05 16:12:04 t46 .gnome-session-[2864]: A graphical session is already running! Jun 05 16:12:04 t46 systemd-coredump[2901]: Process 2864 (.gnome-session-) of user 1000 terminated abnormally with signal 6/ABRT, processing... Jun 05 16:12:04 t46 systemd[1]: Created slice Slice /system/systemd-coredump. Jun 05 16:12:04 t46 systemd[1]: Started Process Core Dump (PID 2901/UID 0). Jun 05 16:12:04 t46 systemd-coredump[2902]: [🡕] Process 2864 (.gnome-session-) of user 1000 dumped core.
| 14:22:08 |
@mcnesium:matrix.org | how can there be another graphical session, when the system just booted? any ideas? | 14:22:48 |
| 9lore changed their display name from 9lore to 9lore | call LORE. | 14:35:03 |
| 7 Jun 2026 |
| WorldsGoneMad joined the room. | 20:35:35 |
| 8 Jun 2026 |
| 9lore changed their display name from 9lore | call LORE to 9lore. | 00:35:29 |
winston | I've seen another signal 6/ABRT being reported on discourse before, but I haven't seen the session is already running message 🤔 | 14:47:23 |