!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

416 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...)92 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
5 Jan 2024
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org *

Do you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615, but GitHub "helpfully" hides most of the comments.

Basically, currently we have attrsets above and below the "org/[…]" keys, so changing to a nested attrset would be more "natural", and would allow people to organise the contents like any other attrset (such as grouping org.gnome settings in a single attrset). We've done the same for example in programs.git.config.

23:37:24
6 Jan 2024
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgHm, is there a way to get GDM to not show a "fingerprint failed" message every time if I have fprintd explicitly disabled for login in pam?00:32:51
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.org

Do you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615, but GitHub "helpfully" hides most of the comments.

Basically, currently we have attrsets above and below the "org/[…]" keys, so changing to a nested attrset would be more "natural", and would allow people to organise the contents like any other attrset (such as grouping org.gnome settings in a single attrset). We've done the same for example in programs.git.config.

there was quite a bit of back and forth. If you use Refined GitHub browser extension, you can alt click a collapsed item and it will expand all collapsed items of that type.
01:41:20
@diamondburned:matrix.orgdiamond (it/its) changed their profile picture.06:13:44
@sachesi:matrix.orgsachesi x joined the room.14:33:57
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
there was quite a bit of back and forth. If you use Refined GitHub browser extension, you can alt click a collapsed item and it will expand all collapsed items of that type.
Cool, FYI it's this discussion. The point about duplicate keys is well taken - that should probably be documented so that it doesn't come up again in an issue.
22:31:27
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar l0b0: what do you mean about duplicate keys? 23:02:30
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
l0b0: what do you mean about duplicate keys?
This comment
23:17:19
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
l0b0: what do you mean about duplicate keys?
* This comment - IIUC we can't support that with nested attrsets.
23:17:55
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnaroh, right – but since we do not support nested attributes, it is not an issue currently23:18:15
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
oh, right – but since we do not support nested attributes, it is not an issue currently
That's what I mean - it's a good argument against moving to nested attrsets.
23:18:36

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6