| 14 Oct 2025 |
 @normalcea:matrix.org | Then I still think GNOME shouldn't hold up dropping qtwayland from the wrapper hook. | 21:27:17 |
| @normalcea:matrix.org | It seems to me that GNOME either has to implement SSD or Qt needs to funnel the GNOME CSD into qtbase. | 21:28:11 |
| @normalcea:matrix.org | In any case, GNOME users should be used to this by now | 21:28:18 |
| @normalcea:matrix.org | * It seems to me that GNOME either has to implement SSD or Qt needs to funnel the GNOME CSD into qtbase in a future release or so. | 21:28:57 |
 K900 | Well if anyone wants to volunteer themselves to rewrite the GNOME CSD plugin to use QPainter | 21:29:02 |
| K900 | Then I'm sure the Qt people will be interested | 21:29:02 |
| K900 | But also, again, I don't think there's any significant problems with dropping it from the hook, the question is whether we want to make it so the default GNOME setups include the plugin | 21:30:34 |
| K900 | And if yes, how | 21:30:34 |
| @normalcea:matrix.org | I think default GNOME setups shouldn't include the plugin if it involves pulling in qt6base. | 21:33:12 |
| @normalcea:matrix.org | GNOME upstream has made this an issue for platform toolkits to solve, so GNOME users should live with that | 21:35:06 |
