| 5 Nov 2021 |
 Irenes | this was the point at which I made the decision that I needed to become involved with the social aspects of Nix in order to do whatever I can to help | 02:03:04 |
| Irenes | and which lead directly to writing the RFC | 02:03:12 |
| Irenes | it is incorrect that nobody reached out to him prior to that thread | 02:03:36 |
| Irenes | but those communications are private | 02:03:41 |
 jonringer | After I retracted his nomination as Release Manager at the desire of WorldofPeace, I guess I was the only one who had reached out to him to let him know that people were disgruntled with him and that he should change his behavior | 02:03:45 |
| Irenes | no | 02:03:53 |
| Irenes | you were the only one he took seriously | 02:03:58 |
| Irenes | I am glad that you did that | 02:04:02 |
| Irenes | I think it helped | 02:04:05 |
| Irenes | I am not comfortable giving my opinion of him in this public setting, we can take this to 1:1 if you want to discuss more | 02:04:28 |
| jonringer | In reply to @irenes:matrix.org
it is incorrect that nobody reached out to him prior to that thread This is technically true. I was the first that wanted to help him, rather than just let me know how he f**ked up | 02:04:36 |
| Irenes | I can only imagine how he'd feel if he joined this channel and saw the discussion of him | 02:04:36 |
| Irenes | I wasn't a party to all of this either, I can only answer for my own actions, you know | 02:04:59 |
| Irenes | I saw that something was broken so I got involved to try to fix it | 02:05:08 |
| Irenes | I agree that it should never have come to that | 02:05:14 |
| Irenes | at the risk of being overly self congratulatory, this sort of thing is why the RFC focuses so heavily on having an actual job that is to mediate conflicts | 02:08:16 |
| Irenes | ie. help people talk them through in whatever way is most appropriate for the situation | 02:08:24 |
| Irenes | I don't want a repeat of that mess | 02:08:42 |
| Irenes | that's the whole point | 02:08:47 |
 tomberek | I'd like to understand the "I do personally believe, although it’s hard to be sure, that most people who read it liked it
and didn’t comment because there was nothing to change
I sure hope we have some way to assess that seriously in this process" part. I'm interested in this belief and assessment. | 02:09:04 |
| Irenes | I mean, we got a lot of extremely positive comments on the GitHub thread | 02:09:26 |
| Irenes | some of them short, some of them long | 02:09:31 |
| Irenes | we also got lots of positive reactji | 02:09:37 |
| Irenes | I've never been through the RFC process before so I'm not qualified to speak to the procedures for adoption | 02:10:10 |
| Irenes | I was just expressing a hope that we can look at what the community actually thinks, you know? | 02:10:55 |
| Irenes | rather than have the conversation be dominated by whoever talks loudest, because I don't think that would be fair to anyone | 02:11:11 |
| jonringer | In reply to @irenes:matrix.org
I can only imagine how he'd feel if he joined this channel and saw the discussion of him I've talked to him a lot, and he would agree with most of what I said. If he wants to join the discussion, I would be more than glad for him to do so. | 02:11:29 |
| Irenes | okay | 02:11:46 |
| Irenes | well | 02:11:47 |
| Irenes | my thoughts on sandro are that, of course, if the RFC were enacted it should be a clean slate | 02:11:58 |
