!ZRgXNaHrdpGqwUnGnj:nixos.org

NixOS Security Triage

691 Members
Coordination and triage of security issues in nixpkgs216 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Jan 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* that is not a valid backport that fits contributing.md16:51:57
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)tell me more16:52:11
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabackports need to be cherry-picks from master if possible16:52:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#manually-backporting-changes16:53:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* backports need to be cherry-picks from master if applicable16:54:04
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)I'm happy to do whatever. I'll note that none of that mentions staging. The last PRs I've made against release branches have all been in this form, since they had to go to staging, and cherry-picking/rebasing was the order of the day.16:54:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawith how you're currently doing it you are also bypassing the cherry-pick check 😄 16:57:59
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* with how you're currently doing it you are also bypassing the cherry-pick check, because it can't find any references to commits on master/staging/... 😄 16:58:19
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)Again, happy to do whatever, but I literally cherry-picked the PR commit on top of the staging-24.11 branch. If there's a built-in delay before a PR can be opened against a release branch for security issues, in the immortal words of a certain president, "I'm learning about it right now! Amazing!" I have to go do weekend stuff now, so I'll leave merging/editing/rejecting in all y'all's hands until the evening.17:05:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe master PR is vim: 9.1.0990 -> 9.1.1006 #372980 17:05:55
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe 24.11 pR is vim: 9.1.0787 -> 9.1.1006 #37298117:06:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaso you're hiding at least the 9.1.0787 -> 9.1.0990 commit 17:06:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* the 24.11 PR is vim: 9.1.0787 -> 9.1.1006 #37298117:06:23
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8) I'm still super confused. During the cherry-pick process, I edited the staging commit's description from 9.1.0990 to 9.1.0787 (since when applied on staging-24.11, that's the version it would be upgrading.) Is the assumption that release branches get the full set of PRs backported?! 17:08:44
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaeach individual intermediate commit, yeah17:09:43
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)Ok, I think I understand.17:12:00
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)* Ok, I think I understand. I picked the intermediate commits too.17:13:24
@hexa:lossy.networkhexalet's continue on the PR17:16:10
12 Jan 2025
@strutztm:strutztm.de@strutztm:strutztm.de joined the room.00:24:58
13 Jan 2025
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korz Not sure if these are the same that were fixed in vaultwarden 1.32.7 three weeks ago:
https://chaos.social/@fbausch/113821745299078611
15:28:46
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korz I think they're all already fixed in the version of vaultwarden we ship 15:29:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaearlier15:29:53
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathey were fixed in 1.32.515:30:14
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas KorzI see, thanks!15:33:12
14 Jan 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/14/4 git 18:14:18
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/952657 rsync 18:14:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/32201218:14:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/37378418:15:01
@tgerbet:matrix.orgtgerbetCurrently building 2.47.2 :) 18:16:42
@tgerbet:matrix.orgtgerbet* Currently building 2.47.2 :) https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/37378418:31:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6