| 21 Sep 2022 |
 Mic92 | Yeah, and then maybe switch to a big paragraph just naming them. | 13:19:01 |
| Mic92 | So the bigger ones get an explanantion while the smaller ones could be linked to | 13:19:27 |
 Winter (she/her) | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
Yeah, and then maybe switch to a big paragraph just naming them. Naming the ones we don't call out you mean) | 13:19:56 |
 Linux Hackerman | Ideally the modules would all have docs that can be linked to :> | 13:19:56 |
| Winter (she/her) | *? | 13:20:00 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @linus:schreibt.jetzt
Ideally the modules would all have docs that can be linked to :> options.html hides /s | 13:20:18 |
| Mic92 | I was thinking of just doing something like: [modulea](alink), [moduleb](blink), [module](clink) | 13:21:09 |
| Winter (she/her) | Yes, but are we also keeping the "major" modules explanation thing, or are you saying doing that in place of it? | 13:22:00 |
| Mic92 | Yes, those would stay | 13:22:25 |
| Winter (she/her) | Ah, okay, no I got what you meant the first time. | 13:22:42 |
| Mic92 | I would not have an explanation for all module though. | 13:22:42 |
| Winter (she/her) | i can't imagine how tedious that would be lol | 13:22:58 |
| Mic92 | I did this :) | 13:23:07 |
| Linux Hackerman | I feel like copying the enable option description would be more informative without being much more effort? | 13:23:22 |
| Winter (she/her) | oh you mean like the "c is a y for a" | 13:23:23 |
| Mic92 | But it was a mechanical task | 13:23:23 |
| Mic92 | sometimes the enable description is helpful. | 13:24:02 |
| Mic92 | But it was not always the case | 13:24:08 |
| Mic92 | But either way, if not all modules get a description than we have more time to make the rest better anyway | 13:24:40 |
| Mic92 | I think it would also help to set an upper bound on the length | 13:25:17 |
| Winter (she/her) | Eh? If we do the module description one and done then it's not too much time wasted. | 13:25:20 |
 hexa | please apply on the discourse already 😛 | 13:25:21 |
| Winter (she/her) | if you're talking to me, i was just doing that ;p | 13:25:37 |
| Mic92 | Sure, it might be automateable but we would also waste the readers time. | 13:26:03 |
| Winter (she/her) | Isn't that also the same with listing them all without descriptions? | 13:26:29 |
| Mic92 | If it's just one compressed paragraph, that one can skip over? | 13:27:18 |
| Mic92 | I think that might be worth a try | 13:27:24 |
| Mic92 | winterqt: consider yourself hired :) Please post on https://discourse.nixos.org/t/22-11-call-for-release-manager-and-editor/21861 :) | 13:28:14 |
| Winter (she/her) | i was writing :) sec | 13:28:32 |
| Mic92 | You can add me as the previous release editor as well | 13:28:32 |
