| 27 Sep 2025 |
|  yapxuan joined the room. | 20:21:53 |
| 28 Sep 2025 |
 tornax | Hi! May I ask if the new crowdsec module may not be added to stable for the next release (yet) please? It feels like as if there is still some work to do (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/446307). So I'd like to keep its config as unstable for the time being. | 19:08:33 |
| tornax | * Hi! May I ask if the new crowdsec module may not be added to stable for the next release (yet) please (just in case if that's going to happen)? It feels like as if there is still some work to do (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/446307). So I'd like to keep its config as unstable for the time being. | 19:08:55 |
 vcunat | If you keep the PR as draft until the 25.11 fork-off happens... | 19:54:49 |
| 29 Sep 2025 |
 Sandro 🐧 | It is technically not possible to exclude the module from the release unless we remove it again.
But I don't see a problem backporting the fix PR whenever it is ready. | 13:25:01 |
|  @brian:bmcgee.ie left the room. | 13:40:19 |
 leona | This depends a bit on how the fix PR actually works. For it to be backportable, it would be good to allow for a seamless transition | 15:39:02 |
| leona | but also it's correct what Sandro said, that there is no technical possibility to remove the module from the release. We could ofc remove the module directly after branch-off, but this also feels a bit strange | 15:39:43 |
| Sandro 🐧 | The module is pretty new and so far it does not really work out of the box. So I would just say that it is fine to Backport even if it is breaking. Just my opinion though. | 15:41:27 |
| 30 Sep 2025 |
|  Lun joined the room. | 14:01:39 |
