| 14 May 2024 |
|  infinisil changed their profile picture. | 17:44:24 |
 Arian | I'm not planning on fixing the amazonImageZfs image. I don't have any experience with ZFS and i don't think we ever uploaded the ZFS ones to Amazon in the past. Perhaps we can remove it from the release channel? | 18:20:58 |
| Arian | Happy to review a fix for it though. (Sorry I just need to be very aware of my bandwidth) | 18:21:19 |
| Arian | Same for the ec2-nixops test. That can probably just be removed. I can't maintain support for nixops as I never used it | 18:23:37 |
| Arian | (I'll make some PRs so they don't affect ZHF) | 18:24:52 |
 @stablejoy:matrix.org | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
I'm not planning on fixing the amazonImageZfs image. I don't have any experience with ZFS and i don't think we ever uploaded the ZFS ones to Amazon in the past. Perhaps we can remove it from the release channel? How important is this? I only have experience with having local zfs and eas looking into this. This just looks interesting | 18:53:06 |
| @stablejoy:matrix.org | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
I'm not planning on fixing the amazonImageZfs image. I don't have any experience with ZFS and i don't think we ever uploaded the ZFS ones to Amazon in the past. Perhaps we can remove it from the release channel? * How important is this? I only have experience with having local zfs and was looking into this. This just looks interesting | 18:53:21 |
| Arian | My feeling it is not important given we never uploaded ZFS AMIs to Amazon in the first place so only affects people who were manually uploading them? But i know some people do rely on them. Please have a look! Maybe its just something very simple and trivial | 18:59:39 |
| @stablejoy:matrix.org | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
My feeling it is not important given we never uploaded ZFS AMIs to Amazon in the first place so only affects people who were manually uploading them? But i know some people do rely on them. Please have a look! Maybe its just something very simple and trivial Oh great, I could try in couple days | 19:04:34 |
 Bryan Honof | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
My feeling it is not important given we never uploaded ZFS AMIs to Amazon in the first place so only affects people who were manually uploading them? But i know some people do rely on them. Please have a look! Maybe its just something very simple and trivial I would very much appreciate if there were NixOS AMI images that at least included the kernel package. In the past I've had to set up my own pipeline to create NixOS images, just to enable that. Let me know if I can help out in any way! 😁 | 22:13:17 |
| 15 May 2024 |
|  raghavsood joined the room. | 08:28:21 |
| raghavsood set a profile picture. | 08:38:29 |
 hexa | schedule needs two more boxes ticked | 14:46:20 |
|  lassulus changed their profile picture. | 19:30:52 |
| 16 May 2024 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Right, don't think the staging branch will reach 24.05 anymore (switching to cherry-picking if needed). | 06:28:45 |
 Randy Eckenrode | So post-24.05 stuff can potentially start going into staging? | 12:01:25 |
 Alyssa Ross | yes | 12:01:41 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Great! My ld64/cross/clang18 branch is 170 commits on top of staging right now. I’d like to start landing some of the changes, but I was holding off on some of them because it was too close to release. | 12:09:14 |
|  piegames left the room. | 18:56:55 |
|  @anjoletto:matrix.org left the room. | 21:04:49 |
| 19 May 2024 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
Janne Heß: zh.fail is broken (also git.helsinki.tools where it was running, I think) Just out of interest. Is the nixos configuration that produces this website somewhere available? | 10:16:25 |
| Vladimír Čunát | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
Just out of interest. Is the nixos configuration that produces this website somewhere available? It's open gitlab pipeline... | 10:34:05 |
| Mic92 | Thanks | 10:35:46 |
 Janne Heß | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
Thanks There's also https://github.com/dasJ/zhf which forks the repo | 12:20:16 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
Thanks * There's also https://github.com/dasJ/zhf which mirrors the repo | 12:20:19 |
| Janne Heß | (better than using GH Workflows) | 12:20:37 |
| Janne Heß | * (better than using GH Actions) | 12:20:47 |
|  raboof joined the room. | 18:42:14 |
| raboof | how does the release process work with respect to breaking changes? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/303285 says "no breaking changes on any branch from 2024-05-01". https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/309347 was merged 2024-05-16, but it turns out that broke python3Packages.pythonocc-core (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/312955). Fixing this on the pythonocc-core side seems nontrivial. should we revert https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/309347 for now? | 18:42:48 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes, I think so. | 18:43:40 |
