!aGqRytqbCECitOFhbt:nixos.org

Release Management

341 Members
Release schedule: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/193585 | Feature Freeze: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/194208 | Blockers: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/1391 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
13 Nov 2023
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusor you can have a postgresql-$myservice-install-permissions.service oneshot thingie14:03:56
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI posted https://discourse.nixos.org/t/breaking-changes-announcement-for-unstable/17574/39?u=raitobezarius14:05:10
@bendlas:matrix.orgbendlas
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
or you can have a postgresql-$myservice-install-permissions.service oneshot thingie
good point. I'm wondering if we should advise people to do that instead of mkOrder sorcery
14:06:26
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusYep, I think that might be the best option14:06:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusWe already have people doing local ensure logic in their own modules depending on the circumstances14:07:10
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusWe just move more complexity to NixOS modules authors14:07:18
@bendlas:matrix.orgbendlasonly fly in the ointment: With pre-15 psql, where db user isn't the owner, I think this wouldn't work, creating yet another lockstep - constraint on psql version :/14:10:05
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswe only need to provide the information14:10:55
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusnixpkgs nixos modules are fine14:10:57
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusnon-nixpkgs nixos modules will probably have issues14:11:05
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswe have to write documentation with this in mind14:11:09

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6