!aGqRytqbCECitOFhbt:nixos.org

Release Management

339 Members
25.11 "Xantusia" | https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/Home.html91 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
23 May 2025
@numinit:matrix.orgMorgan (@numinit)great work all 😁20:05:24
@numinit:matrix.orgMorgan (@numinit)always really impressive seeing all the work that goes in 20:05:45
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydoes it make sense to bump the NixOS 25.05 channel to minimize the time there'll be a reverted lib semantics change in it?20:43:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhopefully there won't be many rebuilds right now?20:43:53
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit was ~0 rebuild on Linux20:43:59
@leona:leona.isleonastarted eval20:46:16
24 May 2025
@raf:notashelf.devrafI can take a look in a few hours02:12:26
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossRedacted or Malformed Event02:32:37
@raf:notashelf.devraf Looking at this now, I'm not sure appending .enable to the texts is strictly necessary. It seems to me like the motivation for using programs.foo for the text, but programs.foo.enable, is that it's not possible to link just programs.foo. It might also be inaccurate to write "available as programs.foo.enable" but I can open a PR now to switch all of them 08:36:29
@raf:notashelf.devraf Actually there is an inconsistency, some modules lack .enable entirely? One second 08:38:00
@leona:leona.isleonai think the inconsistency is what they meant08:37:42
@raf:notashelf.devraf * Looking at this now, I'm not sure appending .enable to the texts is strictly necessary. It seems to me like the motivation for using programs.foo for the text, but programs.foo.enable, is that it's not possible to link just programs.foo. It might also be inaccurate to write "available as programs.foo.enable" but I can open a PR now to switch all of them 08:38:49
@raf:notashelf.devrafChecking right now which one of the links are valid right now08:39:38
@raf:notashelf.devraf* Checking right now which one of the links are valid08:39:44
@raf:notashelf.devrafOkay, interesting discovery: neither https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options#opt-services.kimai.enable nor https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options#opt-services.kimai link to the correct position for me. Tested on both Chromium and Firefox, could someone check if it links to the correct pos for them?08:43:25
@leona:leona.isleona probably it needs to be https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options#opt-services.kimai.sites, as services.kimai (nor .enable) doesn't exist 08:43:33
@raf:notashelf.devraf I see, in that case do we want to use .enable for modules that have it, and the first available option for modules that don't? 08:46:28

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6