| 23 May 2025 |
 leona | currently improving the blogpost | 18:30:19 |
| leona | https://channels.nixos.org/?prefix=nixos-unstable/ | 19:01:02 |
| leona | * https://channels.nixos.org/?prefix=nixos-25.05/ | 19:01:06 |
| leona | * https://releases.nixos.org/nixos/25.05/nixos-25.05.802216.55d1f923c480 | 19:01:28 |
| leona | https://channels.nixos.org/?prefix=nixos-25.05/ | 19:01:47 |
| leona | NixOS 25.05 "Warbler" is now released! 🎉 | 19:27:16 |
 xanderio | https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/release-notes#sec-release-25.05-new-services
Is it intended that this release is "nixos 25.05" instead of "release 25.05"? | 19:37:14 |
| xanderio | * https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/release-notes
Is it intended that this release is "nixos 25.05" instead of "release 25.05"? | 19:37:55 |
| leona | it actually is, but it seems like the nixos.org manual ref wasn't updated yet | 19:38:00 |
 misuzu | Not sure if this is the right place but I've checked https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/release-notes#sec-release-25.05-new-modules and found broken (no .enable at the end) or missing "Available as" links for these modules:
Bazecor
Kimai
Kismet
vwifi
Oncall
Homer
Ghidra
xpad-noone
uMurmur
MaryTTS
Reposilite
networking.modemmanager
networking.networkmanager.
Routinator 3000
Bet
µStreamer
PDS
Anubis
Buffyboard
Cursor
CookCLI
| 19:50:01 |
| misuzu | Not sure if this is the right place but I've checked https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/release-notes#sec-release-25.05-new-modules and found broken (no .enable at the end) or missing "Available as" links for these modules:
Bazecor
Kimai
Kismet
vwifi
Oncall
Homer
Ghidra
xpad-noone
uMurmur
MaryTTS
Reposilite
networking.modemmanager
networking.networkmanager
Routinator 3000
Bet
µStreamer
PDS
Anubis
Buffyboard
Cursor
CookCLI | 19:50:20 |
| leona | i currently don't have capacity, but happy for a PR fixing that | 19:57:26 |
| leona | otherwise cc getchoo raf | 19:57:35 |
 Morgan (@numinit) | great work all 😁 | 20:05:24 |
| Morgan (@numinit) | always really impressive seeing all the work that goes in | 20:05:45 |
 emily | does it make sense to bump the NixOS 25.05 channel to minimize the time there'll be a reverted lib semantics change in it? | 20:43:44 |
| emily | hopefully there won't be many rebuilds right now? | 20:43:53 |
| emily | it was ~0 rebuild on Linux | 20:43:59 |
| leona | started eval | 20:46:16 |
| 24 May 2025 |
 raf | I can take a look in a few hours | 02:12:26 |
 Tristan Ross | Redacted or Malformed Event | 02:32:37 |
| raf | Looking at this now, I'm not sure appending .enable to the texts is strictly necessary. It seems to me like the motivation for using programs.foo for the text, but programs.foo.enable, is that it's not possible to link just programs.foo. It might also be inaccurate to write "available as programs.foo.enable" but I can open a PR now to switch all of them | 08:36:29 |
| raf | Actually there is an inconsistency, some modules lack .enable entirely? One second | 08:38:00 |
| leona | i think the inconsistency is what they meant | 08:37:42 |
| raf | * Looking at this now, I'm not sure appending .enable to the texts is strictly necessary. It seems to me like the motivation for using programs.foo for the text, but programs.foo.enable, is that it's not possible to link just programs.foo. It might also be inaccurate to write "available as programs.foo.enable" but I can open a PR now to switch all of them | 08:38:49 |
| raf | Checking right now which one of the links are valid right now | 08:39:38 |
| raf | * Checking right now which one of the links are valid | 08:39:44 |
| raf | Okay, interesting discovery: neither https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options#opt-services.kimai.enable nor https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options#opt-services.kimai link to the correct position for me. Tested on both Chromium and Firefox, could someone check if it links to the correct pos for them? | 08:43:25 |
| leona | probably it needs to be https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options#opt-services.kimai.sites, as services.kimai (nor .enable) doesn't exist | 08:43:33 |
| raf | I see, in that case do we want to use .enable for modules that have it, and the first available option for modules that don't? | 08:46:28 |
