| 26 Nov 2025 |
xanderio | Should a release note entry regarding this be added to the nixpkgs or nixos notes? Personally I'm not even sure if this needs a release note entry. | 13:18:40 |
leona | Nixpkgs release notes in that case, as not a modification to a NixOS module | 13:20:06 |
| 27 Nov 2025 |
| @kacper.uminski:matrix.org joined the room. | 00:27:42 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | Would I sitll be able to back port to 25.11 to remove nim1? | 02:10:34 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.11 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:10:47 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | I will have to backport manually the specific commit. | 02:11:22 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | Also please check this comment: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/443568#issuecomment-3583858495 | 02:11:58 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:12:41 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 & 25.05 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:12:58 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 & 25.11 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:13:06 |
leona | I can say, that I now quite a lot of machines booting with 25.11+6.17+systemd-boot perfectly fine (all of mine e.g.) | 08:28:44 |
leona | with such a issue that takes a unknown amount of time to debug, no not a release blocker. | 08:29:30 |
@eveeifyeve:matrix.org | Also could you please answer the nim question above? | 13:11:51 |
leona | sorry, I don't know what I should answer again. In https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/460946#issuecomment-3526986437 you said that nim1 is still in LTS mode, now you said it's not. With that I cannot give you a clear answer.
If nim1 is not maintained, you can probably now remove it from 25.11. If you need more time, mark it as vulnerable in 25.11. Please don't remove it in 25.05, just mark it as vulnerable if it's not maintained
| 13:20:32 |