!aGqRytqbCECitOFhbt:nixos.org

Release Management

202 Members
24.05 "Uakari" | https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/Home.html60 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 Oct 2024
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/339153 seems wrong. it implies that breaking changes are never forbidden on master
How does it seem wrong? I copied from the release wiki.
13:52:21
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/339153 seems wrong. it implies that breaking changes are never forbidden on master
pretty sure the intent is to restrict at the same time as staging is, as was done in 24.05 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/303285. though admittedly release wiki nor rfc85 ever included that
14:11:28
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit implies that breaking changes are only forbidden on staging branches14:11:53
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhich the 24.05 issue differed on14:12:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
pretty sure the intent is to restrict at the same time as staging is, as was done in 24.05 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/303285. though admittedly release wiki nor rfc85 ever included that
so it's a chronic problem, ok đź« 
14:12:32
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy Eckenrode Given the Darwin stuff can’t go to master, what the policy is for master doesn’t pertinent. My only concern is getting the Darwin stuff into 24.11. 14:14:35
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy Eckenrode * Given the Darwin stuff can’t go to master, what the policy is for master doesn’t seem pertinent. My only concern is getting the Darwin stuff into 24.11. 14:14:46
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster looke like @hexa first started to change it in 22.11 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/193585 but it was not included in the post-release fixup https://github.com/NixOS/release-wiki/pull/60 14:15:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @reckenrode:matrix.org
Given the Darwin stuff can’t go to master, what the policy is for master doesn’t seem pertinent. My only concern is getting the Darwin stuff into 24.11.
I cared about master for my own stuff
14:43:56
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhich is why the schedule confused me14:44:18
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @reckenrode:matrix.org
Given the Darwin stuff can’t go to master, what the policy is for master doesn’t seem pertinent. My only concern is getting the Darwin stuff into 24.11.
How far do you think we are from being able to merge it?
17:59:47
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilya few days18:05:40
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit's just pending review from two other people who have started going through it already18:05:58
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythe follow-up PRs are mostly ready18:06:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily it'll definitely make the next staging-next cycle, which at this rate might not even start before the 11th 18:06:57
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossOk, I think we're good then to get it into 24.1118:25:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat I wonder about staging-next-24.05 as it's been quite some time, too. 18:25:09
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * I wonder about staging-next-24.05 as it's been quite some time, too. (4 weeks) 18:25:33
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossWe can probably squeeze in 1 last staging-next for 24.05?18:25:38
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat1 last seems way too little to me. Given that we promise support until the end of the year?18:26:16
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossOh18:26:54
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossThen we probably can get like 4 or 5 staging-nexts for 24.05?18:27:35
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
I wonder about staging-next-24.05 as it's been quite some time, too. (4 weeks)
I worry that if we do 24.05 next, the Darwin rework cycle becomes the last cycle before release?
18:33:29
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhich would be pretty not good18:33:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyalso, Randy is going to be unavailable starting ~10 days from now, so we should get to any issues ASAP.18:34:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatRushing big features late. That's a tension before all NixOS stable releases.18:37:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyindeed18:42:05
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyin this case, it's not so much a feature as a vital refactor18:42:18
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyDarwin support desperately needs it to be viable; we rushed the 12.3 SDK as an interim measure and we've already had major packages (QEMU, Qt) be unable to be updated without it18:42:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythose two projects don't support 12 officially, so we could easily end up in trouble within 6 months even doing security updates18:43:19

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6