| leona: jopejoe1: are we okay giving a freeze exemption to breaking changes that only affect override interfaces of specific packages, within the next ~week?
my feeling is that it should be fine, because we generally don't give very strong stability guarantees to override interfaces in general – e.g. every time we backport a version bump that drops a no-longer-used dependency we break override interfaces on stable
context is https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445668 and possibly https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/453948
(the former is zero rebuilds and only changes override interfaces, though there will be a follow-up clean-up on staging that will cause rebuilds and slightly change the meaning of e.g. llvmPackages.override on Darwin, but it needs a few more changes before it's ready to land so checking re: the deadline)
| 
Sigmanificient
midischwarz12 joined the room.
vivekanandan_ks set a profile picture.
@midirhee12:tchncs.de removed their profile picture.
dotlambda joined the room.
jopejoe1 (4094@39c3)
vcunat
@azahi:azahi.cc left the room.
raphi-debug joined the room.
@corite:x-hain.de left the room.
adam (moved to @adam:matrix.system72.dev) joined the room.
emily