| 23 May 2024 |
 vcunat | So I guess this will come soon: https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/Branch-Off.html#once-the-channel-is-available | 14:38:25 |
| vcunat | Oh, looking at it, only the step (1) is missing, I think. | 14:40:20 |
 pbsds | it seems the release schedule does not detail when breaking changes are unrestricted on master. Should than be after branch-off, or after tagging the release? | 21:12:45 |
| pbsds | * it seems the release schedule does not detail when breaking changes are unrestricted on master. Should this be after branch-off, or after tagging the release? | 21:13:02 |
 raitobezarius | just after branch-off | 21:13:46 |
| raitobezarius | tagging the release happens on a parallel branch | 21:13:51 |
| pbsds | but this the week of backports. maintaining similarity between master and release-24.05 may be considered benefitial | 21:14:54 |
| pbsds | i commonly see comitters skip waiting for ofborg builds on backport during this week | 21:16:25 |
| pbsds | * i commonly see committers skip waiting for ofborg builds on backport during this week | 21:16:32 |
| pbsds | * i commonly see committers skip waiting for ofborg builds on backports during this week | 21:16:41 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @pederbs:pvv.ntnu.no
i commonly see committers skip waiting for ofborg builds on backports during this week ?????????? | 21:18:25 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @pederbs:pvv.ntnu.no
but this the week of backports. maintaining similarity between master and release-24.05 may be considered benefitial similarity yeah. RMs can better say/change when breaking changes are unrestricted. it should probably be clarified in release wiki though (and posted schedules) | 21:18:26 |
| raitobezarius | skipping ofborg builds is not acceptable under any circumstance | 21:18:38 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @pederbs:pvv.ntnu.no
i commonly see comitters skip waiting for ofborg builds on backport during this week (this is a huge problem that needs to be addressed then) | 21:18:39 |
| raitobezarius | a backport is already a quite involved action | 21:18:46 |
| raitobezarius | skipping their CI is really unacceptable without a proper provided rationale before the merge or something | 21:19:02 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
skipping ofborg builds is not acceptable under any circumstance (well skipping eval checks at least. builds can be separately verified) | 21:19:09 |
| Lily Foster | (which i wouldn't clarify except that the aarch64-darwin build queue exists......) | 21:19:31 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @pederbs:pvv.ntnu.no
but this the week of backports. maintaining similarity between master and release-24.05 may be considered benefitial i don't understand why this is the week of backports | 21:19:44 |
