| 12 Nov 2025 |
eveeifyeve | Am I allowed to as I maintain nim, remove nim 1? Or should I wait til next release. | 07:16:47 |
eveeifyeve | * leona: Am I allowed to as I maintain nim, remove nim 1? Or should I wait til next release. | 07:17:40 |
eveeifyeve | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/8bdf84d9aec5e2260cb81083c3e20cc30a964bbc/pkgs/by-name/ni/nim-unwrapped-2_2/package.nix#L180 | 07:20:00 |
leona | Is nim 1 EOL? You can remove it, but you have to take care of in-tree usages ofc | 07:25:28 |
eveeifyeve | Is there a script that I can the usage of nim1. | 11:43:46 |
eveeifyeve | * Is there a script that I can the usage of nim1? | 11:43:50 |
leona | maybe there are, but you can also just use grep/ripgrep | 11:44:26 |
| Inayet changed their display name from inayet to Inayet. | 12:39:41 |
eveeifyeve | I am finding it hard to deprecate nim1 I am struggling on package mosdepth which uses nim1, but I can't seem to build a lockfile for it. | 13:03:33 |
| daylin joined the room. | 14:49:01 |
| 14 Nov 2025 |
| Aaron Hall joined the room. | 01:18:31 |
Aaron Hall | Emacs org in 25.05 | 05:24:38 |
Aaron Hall | * Emacs org's version, in 25.05, is not available in ELPA (they must have deleted it.) | 05:25:18 |
| Aaron Hall changed their display name from Aaron Hall, MBA to Aaron Hall. | 06:04:00 |
eveeifyeve | Please look at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/435408 they have fixed it in unstable. | 07:26:41 |
leona | i'm doing staging branch-off now. | 09:52:17 |
leona | staging-25.11 and staging-next-25.11 branches exist now (hydra jobsets will be created later) | 10:04:30 |
leona | release-notes + periodic-merge workflows in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/461526 | 10:04:50 |
| MATE joined the room. | 17:54:26 |
| Florian set a profile picture. | 18:40:39 |
| @corngood:corngood.com joined the room. | 19:46:11 |
| 16 Nov 2025 |
dotlambda | What's the point of staging-next-25.11? Won't staging-next be merged into master before branch-off? | 15:05:12 |
dotlambda | I'm asking cause I have a fix for something broken on staging-next and want to make sure it reaches 25.11 too | 15:05:46 |
vcunat | The current staging-next will. | 15:07:44 |
vcunat | The next one won't reach 25.11. | 15:07:50 |
leona | Primarily we have staging-25.11 because the current staging branch won’t reach 25.11 anymore and we want to make it possible directly create the backport PR to staging-25.11. To not complicate things too much, we already create the staging-next-25.11 branch even though it has no technical sense until branchoff | 15:08:04 |
dotlambda | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org The next one won't reach 25.11. I'm aware | 15:08:07 |
vcunat | I think we need staging-next-25.11 already for the auto-merging workflow to work right. | 15:08:32 |
leona | i.e. just give your PR to staging, the backport staging-25.11 label | 15:08:35 |
dotlambda | In reply to @leona:leona.is Primarily we have staging-25.11 because the current staging branch won’t reach 25.11 anymore and we want to make it possible directly create the backport PR to staging-25.11. To not complicate things too much, we already create the staging-next-25.11 branch even though it has no technical sense until branchoff So it's just there for the regular automatic merges? | 15:08:36 |