| 25 Nov 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Nov 25 07:17:05 pluto systemd[1]: Finished Update Channel nixos-25.11-small.
| 07:17:25 |
 leona | https://github.com/NixOS/release-wiki/pull/107 | 08:46:38 |
| Vladimír Čunát | All the channels are up now. | 21:58:49 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Just to clarify: breaking changes are okay now, right? | 22:21:45 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Just to clarify: breaking changes on master are okay now, right? | 22:21:59 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Read a few messages above and it looks like a "yes" | 22:26:27 |
| 26 Nov 2025 |
 jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | Can confirm that your guess is correct ^^ | 07:13:33 |
|  @corngood:corngood.com left the room. | 12:32:43 |
 xanderio | It's probably to late to include dropping odoo 16 in 25.11? It's been out of support since september. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/465241 | 12:43:05 |
| Vladimír Čunát | meta.knownVulnerabilities = [ "EOL explanation" ]; could be a middle ground. I've seen it used in nixpkgs sometimes. | 12:48:33 |
 hexa | I think dropping it during beta is still viable, we have odoo 17 after all | 12:50:58 |
| leona | I would also say that dropping it now is fine | 12:52:07 |
| xanderio | Adding the backport release-25.11 should be enough than? | 13:00:43 |
| leona | Yes | 13:00:53 |
| leona | (And security) | 13:00:57 |
| xanderio | Should a release note entry regarding this be added to the nixpkgs or nixos notes? Personally I'm not even sure if this needs a release note entry. | 13:18:40 |
| leona | Nixpkgs release notes in that case, as not a modification to a NixOS module | 13:20:06 |
| 27 Nov 2025 |
|  Kacper Uminski joined the room. | 00:27:42 |
 eveeifyeve | Would I sitll be able to back port to 25.11 to remove nim1? | 02:10:34 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.11 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:10:47 |
| eveeifyeve | I will have to backport manually the specific commit. | 02:11:22 |
| eveeifyeve | Also please check this comment: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/443568#issuecomment-3583858495 | 02:11:58 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:12:41 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 & 25.05 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:12:58 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 & 25.11 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:13:06 |
| leona | I can say, that I now quite a lot of machines booting with 25.11+6.17+systemd-boot perfectly fine (all of mine e.g.) | 08:28:44 |
| leona | with such a issue that takes a unknown amount of time to debug, no not a release blocker. | 08:29:30 |
| eveeifyeve | Also could you please answer the nim question above? | 13:11:51 |
| leona | sorry, I don't know what I should answer again. In https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/460946#issuecomment-3526986437 you said that nim1 is still in LTS mode, now you said it's not. With that I cannot give you a clear answer.
If nim1 is not maintained, you can probably now remove it from 25.11. If you need more time, mark it as vulnerable in 25.11. Please don't remove it in 25.05, just mark it as vulnerable if it's not maintained
| 13:20:32 |
| leona | If it's still maintained I would prefer keeping it for 25.11 | 13:24:58 |
