| 24 Nov 2025 |
 jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | Same with a lot of other stuff that we found while doing the branch-off | 23:44:29 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | Currently too tired to realy think much about which makes more sense, and can still change it at a later point. | 23:48:07 |
 hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/464333 | 23:53:43 |
| 25 Nov 2025 |
 vcunat |
quic patches on top that have been merged into openssl 3.5
IIRC the official openssl in the end integrated a different API for QUIC than quictls had.
| 06:45:21 |
| vcunat | Nov 25 07:17:05 pluto systemd[1]: Finished Update Channel nixos-25.11-small.
| 07:17:25 |
 leona | https://github.com/NixOS/release-wiki/pull/107 | 08:46:38 |
| vcunat | All the channels are up now. | 21:58:49 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Just to clarify: breaking changes are okay now, right? | 22:21:45 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Just to clarify: breaking changes on master are okay now, right? | 22:21:59 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Read a few messages above and it looks like a "yes" | 22:26:27 |
| 26 Nov 2025 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | Can confirm that your guess is correct ^^ | 07:13:33 |
|  @corngood:corngood.com left the room. | 12:32:43 |
 xanderio | It's probably to late to include dropping odoo 16 in 25.11? It's been out of support since september. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/465241 | 12:43:05 |
| vcunat | meta.knownVulnerabilities = [ "EOL explanation" ]; could be a middle ground. I've seen it used in nixpkgs sometimes. | 12:48:33 |
| hexa | I think dropping it during beta is still viable, we have odoo 17 after all | 12:50:58 |
| leona | I would also say that dropping it now is fine | 12:52:07 |
| xanderio | Adding the backport release-25.11 should be enough than? | 13:00:43 |
| leona | Yes | 13:00:53 |
| leona | (And security) | 13:00:57 |
| xanderio | Should a release note entry regarding this be added to the nixpkgs or nixos notes? Personally I'm not even sure if this needs a release note entry. | 13:18:40 |
| leona | Nixpkgs release notes in that case, as not a modification to a NixOS module | 13:20:06 |
| 27 Nov 2025 |
|  Kacper Uminski joined the room. | 00:27:42 |
 eveeifyeve | Would I sitll be able to back port to 25.11 to remove nim1? | 02:10:34 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.11 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:10:47 |
| eveeifyeve | I will have to backport manually the specific commit. | 02:11:22 |
| eveeifyeve | Also please check this comment: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/443568#issuecomment-3583858495 | 02:11:58 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:12:41 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 & 25.05 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:12:58 |
| eveeifyeve | * Would I sitll be able to backport to 25.05 & 25.11 to remove nim1 because at this point it's EOL? | 02:13:06 |
| leona | I can say, that I now quite a lot of machines booting with 25.11+6.17+systemd-boot perfectly fine (all of mine e.g.) | 08:28:44 |
