| 23 May 2024 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
skipping ofborg builds is not acceptable under any circumstance (well skipping eval checks at least. builds can be separately verified) | 21:19:09 |
| Lily Foster | (which i wouldn't clarify except that the aarch64-darwin build queue exists......) | 21:19:31 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @pederbs:pvv.ntnu.no
but this the week of backports. maintaining similarity between master and release-24.05 may be considered benefitial i don't understand why this is the week of backports | 21:19:44 |
| raitobezarius | this is a bugfixing sequence at most | 21:19:50 |
| raitobezarius | not a "oops i missed the train, let me add my shit" sequence | 21:19:59 |
| Lily Foster | (yeah backports do continue for next 7 months too) | 21:20:05 |
| raitobezarius | so keeping similarity is not a goal afaik | 21:20:23 |
| raitobezarius | master should move on and do its things | 21:20:29 |
| raitobezarius | release-24.05 may continue to obtain some specific bugfixes during the beta phase as the testing uncovers some of them | 21:20:46 |
| raitobezarius | and manual conflict resolution can take place | 21:20:52 |
 pbsds | i looked through is:pull is:closed base:release-24.05, the ones i remember ofborg still building when merged have since completed. Quite a few PRs however never saw ofborg kick in | 21:27:36 |
| pbsds | This would've been solved by a merge wueue | 21:32:25 |
| pbsds | * This would've been solved by a merge queue | 21:32:26 |
| raitobezarius | Yeah but we don't have a merge queue and I don't think it's being worked on by anyone :) | 21:47:05 |
| 24 May 2024 |
 @jacg:matrix.org | Anyone care to offer editorial advice about the following entry in the release notes ? | 08:06:56 |
| @jacg:matrix.org |
dwarf-fortress has been updated to version 50, and its derivations continue to menace with spikes of Nix and bash
| 08:06:57 |
|  @lappihuan:matrix.org joined the room. | 08:08:51 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @jacg:matrix.org
dwarf-fortress has been updated to version 50, and its derivations continue to menace with spikes of Nix and bash
No idea if this is some inside joke, but we can potentially drop it. It doesn't seem to have any actionable insights to me. | 08:39:53 |
| Mic92 | Weijia: Do we want to do the meeting with the release editors? | 08:41:05 |
 Weijia | Does tomorrow's evening work for you? Mic92 jacg | 08:43:16 |
| Weijia | Which would be in the morning for Kirby Little | 08:44:01 |
| Mic92 | Weijia: Not so much. I will be on a train in the evening. All evenings after that are working for me. | 08:55:52 |
| Weijia | I'll be free this Sunday after 10 pm (I hope my flight won't be delayed) | 09:01:06 |
| Weijia | Otherwise, Monday to Wednesday evenings should work for me | 09:01:23 |
| @jacg:matrix.org | Not available on Wed evening; OK for Sun, Mon, Tue evenings (assuming these are evenings in some European time zone). | 09:15:32 |
| Mic92 | So monday or tuesday | 13:28:26 |
| Mic92 | Sunday 10 pm already sounds a bit late. | 13:28:40 |
| Weijia | In reply to @wegank:matrix.org
I'll be free this Sunday after 10 pm (I hope my flight won't be delayed) My flight has been cancelled, I'll be free at 8 pm | 19:51:49 |
| 25 May 2024 |
 tomberek | I like it. Because losing is fun. | 00:10:03 |
| 26 May 2024 |
|  ris_ joined the room. | 10:55:30 |
