| 21 Nov 2023 |
 raitobezarius | heads up figsoda alejandrosame (@riotbib is not in this channel?) we have been re-subscribed to all activities in nixpkgs following a changes in the permissions | 08:40:56 |
| raitobezarius | my notifications makes no sense | 08:41:02 |
 lennart | ah | 08:41:10 |
| lennart | (I am @riotbib :) ) | 08:41:16 |
| lennart | thanks for the heads-up | 08:41:43 |
| raitobezarius | for some reason matrix is stupid and didn't let me highlight you | 09:00:16 |
| raitobezarius | sorry for that | 09:00:19 |
| lennart | easy :) | 09:00:31 |
| lennart | (well I was riotbib, but am lennart now :D) | 09:00:47 |
 Vladimír Čunát | @jtojnar thinks (see #gnome:nixos.org) that the branch is sufficiently stable to merge into nixpkgs master and 23.11. I prodded Hydra to start creating the remaining binaries for that, as it didn't have much to do anyway right now. | 09:53:20 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * @jtojnar thinks (see #gnome:nixos.org) that the gnome branch is sufficiently stable to merge into nixpkgs master and 23.11. I prodded Hydra to start creating the remaining binaries for that, as it didn't have much to do anyway right now. | 09:53:41 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * @jtojnar thinks (see #gnome:nixos.org) that the gnome branch (44->45) is sufficiently stable to merge into nixpkgs master and 23.11. I prodded Hydra to start creating the remaining binaries for that, as it didn't have much to do anyway right now. | 09:54:00 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * @jtojnar thinks (see #gnome:nixos.org) that the gnome branch (44->45) is sufficiently stable to merge into nixpkgs master and 23.11. I prodded Hydra to start creating the remaining binaries for that, as it didn't have much to do anyway right now. | 09:54:31 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * @jtojnar thinks (see #gnome:nixos.org) that the gnome branch (44->45) is sufficiently stable to merge into nixpkgs master and 23.11. I prodded Hydra to start creating the remaining binaries for that, as it didn't have much to do anyway right now. | 09:54:45 |
| raitobezarius | vcunat: how realistic is it from your perspective to merge this now? | 10:09:13 |
| raitobezarius | I cannot a step back when it comes to DE stuff, I never use them tbh | 10:09:32 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I wasn't really following the development of the gnome branch (though I now do use gnome on 23.05), but I trust @jtojnar with that aspect. | 10:10:41 |
| Vladimír Čunát | As for rebuilds, x86_64-linux will have all binaries. There's mainly catching up with the recent haskell-updates merge. Other platforms might lag a little, we'll see in a few hours. | 10:11:32 |
| Vladimír Čunát | TL;DR: I think it will be OK-ish to merge it just before the branch-off. | 10:11:56 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I should've triggered the Hydra job yesterday evening at least. I was too tired to think and make such decisioins. | 10:12:41 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * I should've triggered the Hydra job yesterday evening at least. I was too tired to think and make such decisions. | 10:12:43 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Maybe the PR ended up in void just because of people waiting for each other. | 10:15:16 |
| raitobezarius | Gotcha | 10:39:21 |
 hexa | what's the plan for the existing release-23.11? | 11:00:00 |
| hexa | do I backport to it? do I wait? asking for a browser. | 11:00:14 |
| hexa | * what's the plan for the existing release-23.11 branch? | 11:00:23 |
| raitobezarius | does it still exist? | 11:01:25 |
| raitobezarius | I asked Domen to delete it yesterday | 11:01:29 |
| raitobezarius | no, it doesn't exist | 11:01:40 |
| raitobezarius | you cannot backport to something that doesn't exist, hexa | 11:01:48 |
