| 17 Nov 2023 |
 raitobezarius | But that'd be weird | 14:48:11 |
| raitobezarius | ah I found the problem | 14:50:28 |
| raitobezarius | the invidious test is weird | 14:50:31 |
| raitobezarius | and doing a lot of things | 14:50:32 |
| raitobezarius | ok fixed. | 14:51:31 |
| raitobezarius | now release notes, improved error messages and we ship this | 14:53:20 |
| raitobezarius | and we will deal with all the regressions later on in beta phase | 14:53:32 |
| raitobezarius | hexa: is there any plan on the Python 2.7 breakage stuff? | 16:15:13 |
| raitobezarius | most specifically, everything that depends on resholve | 16:15:19 |
 hexa | a hack by k900 to disable the hook entirely on the python2 builder | 16:15:47 |
| raitobezarius | sounds good | 16:15:58 |
| hexa | and a fix by me that was to costly to go into the running staging cycle, because darwin-stdenv loves python | 16:16:03 |
| raitobezarius | it's not in master yet I assume? | 16:16:05 |
| hexa | * and a fix by me that was too costly to go into the running staging cycle, because darwin-stdenv loves python | 16:16:09 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/268027
\ | 16:16:39 |
| raitobezarius | OK; no one has any opposition for this hack? | 16:17:07 |
| hexa | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/268027
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/267669 | 16:17:11 |
| raitobezarius | We can send it and then work on the better hack via backport later on, right? | 16:17:17 |
| hexa | the better hack is not a hack | 16:17:25 |
| hexa | but yes | 16:17:29 |
| raitobezarius | Apologies | 16:17:38 |
| raitobezarius | (In my mind, anything pertaining to extending Python 2 lifetime is a hack :<) | 16:17:51 |
| hexa | nixpkgs supporting resholve is a hack | 16:18:04 |
| raitobezarius | Agreed | 16:18:20 |
| raitobezarius | Sent | 16:18:58 |
 Randy Eckenrode | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
and a fix by me that was too costly to go into the running staging cycle, because darwin-stdenv loves python Yes. 😠LLVM and a few other things depend on it. | 17:02:20 |
| raitobezarius | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/266270 this was merged | 17:02:40 |
| raitobezarius | All further issues should be dealt by working on the top of that PR instead of reverting it | 17:02:50 |
| raitobezarius | Or reverting it partially to adopt similar workarounds to the "do not use ensureDBOwnership" | 17:03:01 |
| hexa | wondering whether we can get the staging-23.11 branch going | 17:24:52 |
