| 30 Oct 2023 |
 Vladimír Čunát | But gcc is probably more common for our users than clang/llvm. | 14:26:55 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
The pushback against gcc removal was for versions unused in nixpkgs. Yes but GCC is a bit special here | 14:33:32 |
| raitobezarius | We use it as our way to bootstrap nixpkgs, etc. | 14:33:37 |
| raitobezarius | Clang / LLVM is not on the bootstrap path because noone worked yet on "LLVM-only Nixpkgs" | 14:33:57 |
| raitobezarius | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/264369 | 14:38:30 |
|  Anthony Rsl joined the room. | 17:04:17 |
|  pbsds joined the room. | 21:16:39 |
| 31 Oct 2023 |
 figsoda | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/258640#issuecomment-1786235673 | 00:09:44 |
| 1 Nov 2023 |
|  moots joined the room. | 08:49:54 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Dropping unused LLVMs isn't considered a breaking change, right? Or you give yourself an exception. | 15:49:45 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Dropping (most likely) unused LLVMs isn't considered a breaking change, right? Or you give yourself an exception. | 15:50:00 |
