| 22 May 2023 |
 Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | Can this be backported? | 22:59:46 |
| 23 May 2023 |
 Vladimír Čunát | 23.05 channels are there, at least the two linux ones for now. Also shown on status.nixos.org | 09:36:19 |
 hexa | migrated all machines to 23.05, nothing has caught fire yet | 11:46:37 |
 lennart | Awesome | 11:49:53 |
| lennart | That's nice to hear | 11:50:07 |
| hexa | * migrated all private machines to 23.05, nothing has caught fire yet | 11:51:37 |
 raitobezarius | I will migrate personal infra to 23.05 too today | 11:55:22 |
 Sandro | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
migrated all private machines to 23.05, nothing has caught fire yet FYI I rebased our fork yesterday and cherry-picked our patches back in and in the next days I am going to fix all the eval failures. | 11:55:39 |
| Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | If your infra isn't on unstable then you ain't living right 💯 | 12:10:20 |
| Sandro | my private is but the other isn't. It is using stable with ~200 cherry-picked commits | 12:24:23 |
| Sandro | and first road block for me: how to migrate of networking.firewall.autoLoadConntrackHelpers? I need to change the net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_max sysctl setting because the nixos firewall does conn tracking by default and VMs set this setting to little based on RAM causing reverse proxies to drop requests.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/219455#issuecomment-1559177681 | 12:26:02 |
| raitobezarius | https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-search/pull/657 | 12:33:03 |
| raitobezarius | lennart: how do you feel about the status of the release notes atm? | 13:31:31 |
| raitobezarius | we need to start finalizing this | 13:31:36 |
| raitobezarius | Thorkell | [U.] #09 nixos-system-Thorkell 23.05pre-git -> 23.11pre-git | 13:39:17 |
| raitobezarius | good good | 13:39:19 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Aaah, we can't have 23.05 darwin channel because release critical stuff hasn't been building since January and noone seems to mind 🤦
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-23.05-darwin/darwin-tested
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/trunk/darwin-tested | 13:50:56 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Aaah, we can't have 23.05 darwin channel because release critical stuff (wireshark) hasn't been building since January and noone seems to mind 🤦
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-23.05-darwin/darwin-tested
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/trunk/darwin-tested | 13:52:15 |
| raitobezarius | I feel like there should be a Darwin Release Manager | 13:52:21 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Any idea where it's best to ask for a fix? | 13:53:01 |
 Alyssa Ross | if nobody seems to mind, that suggests it's not really critical? :P | 13:53:12 |
| Alyssa Ross | so maybe we should just drop it? | 13:53:18 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes. I mean, if noone wants to maintain a package, it will get dropped from the critical set. It's that easy. | 13:53:27 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
Any idea where it's best to ask for a fix? Really, I'd say #NixOS Dev or pushing a issue while pining @NixOS/darwin-maintainers | 13:53:30 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
Any idea where it's best to ask for a fix? * Really, I'd say #NixOS Dev or pushing a issue while pinging @NixOS/darwin-maintainers | 13:54:05 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Here we get hit by the weird differences between unstable and stable workflows. | 13:54:17 |
| Vladimír Čunát | (nixpkgs-unstable is not blocked by the package and we don't have another darwin-containing channel) | 13:55:06 |
| raitobezarius | Could we have a virtual nix-darwin-unstable somewhat? | 13:55:25 |
| raitobezarius | which would block à la stable while being unstable? | 13:55:37 |
| Alyssa Ross | isn't that nixpkgs-unstable? | 13:56:06 |
