!aGqRytqbCECitOFhbt:nixos.org

Release Management

342 Members
25.11 "Xantusia" | https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/Home.html92 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 May 2023
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThis way of blacklisting doesn't work transitively, i.e. they can still get pulled by another package to get built on Hydra. That might be a practical issue.14:42:51
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAaah14:44:01
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius Can you comment on this Vladimír Čunát ? 14:44:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius(on the 2nd PR)14:44:10
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThe only way to fix this is to have the allowInsecurePredicate block them I imagine14:44:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswhich is a shame because it means that they have to be marked in release.nix14:44:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátProbably. Other per-package marks don't seem suitable. Or drop the packages for good.14:46:38
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI think we expanded the drop package budget for now14:47:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThis is a thing for 23.11 now14:47:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát Or we might change hydraPlatforms == [] case to act transitively. 14:47:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusHow easy it is given the time constraints?14:47:43
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát A couple simple lines in the check-meta.nix I think. 14:48:16
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.orgCan we not add some kind of flags to the blacklisted packages that will get read by allowInsecurePredicate ?14:48:20
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswhat do you suggest as a flag name?14:48:41
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.orgThe hydraPlatforms == [] semantics are not super clear14:48:52
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius dangerousEnough = true; :>? 14:48:55
21 May 2023
@soul-driver:talos.chat@soul-driver:talos.chat joined the room.13:30:48
@soul-driver:talos.chat@soul-driver:talos.chatis there something very good in 23.05 to wait for? Like flake stabilization, alternative daemon\service manager or something like that13:32:44
@lennart:0520.chlennartyes, I'd wait13:33:33
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaas opposed to doing what?13:34:37
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.orgforking nixpkgs and branching 23.05 themselves13:35:14
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.org soul-driver: here are the current release notes for 23.05 : https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md 13:36:39
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @soul-driver:talos.chat
is there something very good in 23.05 to wait for? Like flake stabilization, alternative daemon\service manager or something like that
no you should wait at least 28.05
13:51:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusFlake stabilization is not a NixOS thing BTW13:52:14
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusIt's a Nix thing13:52:17
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.orgFlakes ares able13:52:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAlternative daemon / service manager is probably a quite insane effort which won't happen before someone really want it13:52:35
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.org * Flakes ares stable13:52:36
@julienmalka:matrix.org@julienmalka:matrix.org * Flakes are stable13:52:46
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧We love systemd so much, that we are not implementing alternatives /S13:52:46

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6