| 30 May 2022 |
 Sandro 🐧 | first we should update it in master to make sure there are no major bugs | 23:31:03 |
 Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/175541 | 23:46:22 |
| 31 May 2022 |
 Vladimír Čunát | -22.05-aarch64 refuses to evaluate. I can't see the cause now: https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/release-22.05-aarch64#tabs-errors | 05:13:45 |
| Vladimír Čunát | nixos-22.05 channel is being updated. I cancelled a test that would take hours to time out and fail. | 06:14:51 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Ah, I thought the release wasn't announced yet. Nevermind. | 06:16:29 |
| Vladimír Čunát | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
-22.05-aarch64 refuses to evaluate. I can't see the cause now: https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/release-22.05-aarch64#tabs-errors That might be a bit unpleasant, as the corresponding channel is before the 22.05 tag now. | 06:32:55 |
 Janne Heß | In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
after testing it a bit on unstable I don't think it's strictly necessary to have it on unstable for testing. I wouldn't expect the default nix package to change so it's just a package addition | 06:33:18 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
-22.05-aarch64 refuses to evaluate. I can't see the cause now: https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/release-22.05-aarch64#tabs-errors hmm strange | 06:33:39 |
| Janne Heß |
Collecting from unknown thread
| 06:34:55 |
| Janne Heß | I do love the output | 06:34:58 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
-22.05-aarch64 refuses to evaluate. I can't see the cause now: https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/release-22.05-aarch64#tabs-errors Fixed by evaluating again | 07:11:49 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I did try that before posting. Oh well. | 07:12:28 |
| Janne Heß | Maybe I had the luckier hands this time ;) | 07:12:41 |
| 1 Jun 2022 |
|  underpantsgnome! joined the room. | 09:06:38 |
| 9 Jun 2022 |
|  tbl left the room. | 14:43:09 |
| 28 Jun 2022 |
|  ma27 changed their profile picture. | 11:37:44 |
| 30 Jun 2022 |
| Janne Heß | Since the support for 21.11 ends very soon, what do you people think about protecting the old branch? That way there is no way it can seem supported in the future | 15:33:59 |
 hexa | IIRC protection only means no direct pushes | 15:59:04 |
| hexa | doesn't mean you can't PR into it, no? | 15:59:15 |
| hexa | The last release I went through all open release-branch PRs and closed them with a template message. | 15:59:41 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+base%3Arelease-21.11 | 16:36:15 |
| Vladimír Čunát | You can choose various options when protecting a branch, but I can't see a complete freeze. Maybe it could be hacked from some of the options like "Require deployments to succeed before merging" but I certainly don't feel motivated to work on it. | 18:09:40 |
| 1 Jul 2022 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
doesn't mean you can't PR into it, no? ah well | 21:01:48 |
| hexa | took care of closing all remaining PRs | 21:57:00 |
| 2 Jul 2022 |
|  Amit Levy left the room. | 08:28:16 |
| 4 Jul 2022 |
| Janne Heß | In case anyone is interested in reviewing: https://github.com/NixOS/release-wiki/pull/44 | 18:10:08 |
 jonringer | lgtm | 18:25:10 |
| Janne Heß | noice | 18:25:18 |
| Janne Heß | would have been horrible if there were huge mistakes because I already did all that :D | 18:25:32 |
| 8 Jul 2022 |
| Janne Heß | I kind of forgot myself, but it looks like the retrospective is in 15min 👀 does anyone plan on coming? | 16:45:45 |
