!aGqRytqbCECitOFhbt:nixos.org

Release Management

391 Members
26.05 "Yarara" | https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/Home.html109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 May 2026
@dandart:matrix.orgEmber changed their display name from Ember Void to Ember.15:21:41
11 May 2026
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily how do we feel about https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/513844 for 26.05? it's a zero-rebuild fairly substantial perf improvement, it theoretically changes the behaviour of lib.systems.equals but only if you violate its stated calling contract, so nominally shouldn't be breaking 23:09:10
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I ask mainly because it did require an internal lib.systems test adjusting to not break that contract :) 23:09:21
12 May 2026
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierl Btw do we already have a name and logo for the 26.05 release? 00:56:18
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaxantusia01:50:32
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaor was it yarara?01:50:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI hope you like snakes01:51:03
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierlXantusia was the last release if I remember correctly01:51:29
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierl

I was in the art group with some suggestions last time.

I wonder how it looks this time

01:52:35
@raf:notashelf.devrafI know and trust llakala with this kind of stuff, so I'm inclined to trust their PR when it comes to optimizing and doing so safely.05:20:43
13 May 2026
@phonkd:matrix.orgphonkd joined the room.08:44:50
@yaya:uwu.isyaya Name is Yarara and a logo does not exist yet (I submitted a call-for-art in NixOS/branding#35) 10:21:59
@joe6784:matrix.orgjoe6784 joined the room.11:20:31
14 May 2026
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát

When nixpkgs-26.05-darwin gets created, we'll get a bit hit by the mess which we have in the channel-blocking package sets, as here it contains some packages which do not block nixpkgs-unstable (no idea why, really).

In particular, gimp2 and cabal2nix will probably turn out problematic. Ref: https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/staging-next/darwin-tested#tabs-constituents

I suppose we mainly need to adjust the darwin channel-blocking package set, somehow.

12:27:01
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI suppose it's a bit late to try implementing the jobset merge I proposed to fix that? (I figured 26.11 made more sense given the x86_64-darwin drop)13:34:42
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThat sounds like overkill for this particular thing.13:38:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátIt's just about which set of packages is meant to be blocking.13:39:15
@lucasoe:matrix.orgLucasOe joined the room.18:14:28
@lucasoe:matrix.orgLucasOe left the room.18:25:24
15 May 2026
@jmchapman:matrix.orgjmchapman joined the room.16:51:44
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierlSooo, i made a mistake while merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/515479 and the version in the attr-name is wrong. I suggest merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/520658 in order to remove the offending version from the attr-name.23:46:43
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierl* Sooo, i made a mistake while merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/515479 and the version in the attr-name is wrong. I suggest merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/520658 in order to remove the offending version from the attr-name. The change should not cause any rebuilds.23:46:55
16 May 2026
@samestep:matrix.orgsame joined the room.10:49:54
@samestep:matrix.orgsamehey! quick question: i see that the dates in the schedule on pr 503391 were edited; should pr 516381 be updated accordingly? i'd edit it myself but i don't have permissions11:24:56
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayes, correct. will happen in a minute.11:28:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexarm poked11:28:49
@yaya:uwu.isyayathanks for the hint!13:26:41
17 May 2026
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/521022#pullrequestreview-4304200622 Technically this is a change in behavior, pointing a path to a runtime-mutable config from /etc to /var/lib. It was broken before and never really worked properly, which is why the fix here is imo non-breaking. However, it is still a change in behavior. Does this need a breaking changes exception? Do i just wait for branch-off? The change of the PR is overall just necessary and much-needed cleanup, and i'd really hate to block on a technicality, but i also don't want some release manager to come chew me out for merging stuff after freeze i shouldn't merge.12:06:38
@yaya:uwu.isyayaReviewed the PR and agree with having it merged with a release note.16:07:09
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)thanks!16:08:42

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6