| 21 May 2022 |
 Vladimír Čunát | * That's to 21.05 just three weeks ago. | 20:49:39 |
| Vladimír Čunát | To me, removal of support is just removal of commitment/guarantees about maintenance. | 20:50:18 |
| Vladimír Čunát | But if someone still wants to do it, I can't see why block it. But naturally it should have lower priority on the shared infra. | 20:50:55 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * But if someone still wants to do it, I can't see why block it. Naturally it should have lower priority on the shared infra. | 20:51:05 |
 Janne Heß | I've had this discussion in another context, but I think changing EOL releases makes it seem a lot like it's still (at least partially) maintained | 20:51:49 |
| Vladimír Čunát | If they are, is it bad that they look like it? | 20:52:39 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Maybe if it's confusing, yes. | 20:53:11 |
| Janne Heß | Well if they were, we should have a consistent wording. status.nixos.org clearly states these as EOL | 20:53:15 |
| Janne Heß | yeah | 20:53:16 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Release notes stress the dates visibly, more importantly. | 20:53:39 |
| Vladimír Čunát | But I can't estimate how well this information gets passed in practice. Our point of view is too biased to see ourselves. | 20:54:29 |
| Janne Heß | Hm, if it was me, I'd disable the jobsets (maybe leave the previous release?) and protect the release- branch. This way we can get around all possible accidents. But that's my opinion and I know it's the strictest one and there are people who would probably disagree | 20:54:56 |
| Janne Heß | * Hm, if it was me, I'd disable the jobsets (maybe leave the previous release?) and protect the release- branch. This way we can get around all possible accidents. But that's my opinion and I know it's the strictest one and there are people who would disagree | 20:55:07 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Right, e.g. for older than 21.05 right now that makes sense to me. | 20:57:25 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Though very little impact I guess, as I'd hope noone uses such old channels/branches anymore. | 20:58:25 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Though very little impact I guess, as I'd hope noone follows such old channels/branches anymore. | 20:58:34 |
| 23 May 2022 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I don't think it's required to wait for aarch64-linux to finish. That could take several days, I'm afraid, and I find it unlikely that some mass failure is lurking in there. So I believe you can merge staging-next whenever you feel like proceeding with the May 22 schedule. | 09:03:49 |
| Janne Heß | oof | 09:07:00 |
| Janne Heß | also: nice! | 09:07:05 |
 Linux Hackerman | Can we throw more builders at it? | 09:07:27 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I think that is still possible. Graham would be the one to ask. | 09:07:56 |
| * Janne Heß searches for the couple hundret rpi4s that should be running somewhere | 09:08:08 |
| * Janne Heß * searches for the couple hundred rpi4s that should be running somewhere | 09:08:13 |
| Janne Heß | I will probably do the branch-off this afternoon to evening | 09:08:36 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I see two big and two small aarch64-linux machines in there now. | 09:08:37 |
| Janne Heß | Redacted or Malformed Event | 09:09:14 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
I will probably do the branch-off this afternoon to evening we can do the jitsi-thing again that we did last time, hexa gave a 👍️ for this | 09:09:33 |
|  Jeroen Simonetti joined the room. | 09:32:54 |
| Jeroen Simonetti changed their display name from Jeroen to Jeroen Simonetti. | 09:36:20 |
| Janne Heß | Vladimír Čunát: could you create the jobsets in advance or will you be available later today anyway? | 09:44:58 |
