| 7 Mar 2026 |
 eveeifyeve | * So I had to add this to zulu to fix this. I am now just waiting on xcode to download. | 21:38:34 |
| 8 Mar 2026 |
| eveeifyeve | The pr is submitted, however there is a issue with autoPatchelfHook which I don't know how to debug, maybe you could give it a try and debug the issue?
The issue is here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/497855#issuecomment-4018777627 | 12:53:12 |
| eveeifyeve | * The pr is submitted, however there is a issue with autoPatchelfHook which I don't know how to debug, maybe you could give it a try and debug the issue?
The issue is here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/497855#issuecomment-4018777627 | 12:53:15 |
|  SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) to SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes). | 23:34:04 |
| 10 Mar 2026 |
|  @frederic:scs.ems.host left the room. | 13:23:26 |
| 14 Mar 2026 |
|  amadaluzia -> 4d2.org changed their display name from amadaluzia to amadaluzia[uorg]. | 18:50:59 |
| amadaluzia -> 4d2.org changed their display name from amadaluzia[uorg] to amadaluzia -> 4d2.org. | 21:23:08 |
| 21 Mar 2026 |
 Benedikt Ritter (britter) | There's something off with jdk11: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/502023 I've looked into openjdk/generic.nix but gave up pretty quickly 😅 | 20:25:55 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | This makes the tests for Gradle fail as well, because they expect the package version to equal the version reported by the Java binary. | 20:26:31 |
| 22 Mar 2026 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | It looks like 11.0.31+0 incorrectly reports 11.0.30. I've created a PR to bump to 11.0.31+1 which correctly reports 11.0.31 🤷♂️ reviews appreciated! https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/502168 | 20:31:02 |
 emily | 11.0.31 isn't released yet | 20:38:10 |
| emily | the -ga tags are final releases https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u/tags | 20:38:18 |
| emily | the update script should only update to those | 20:38:25 |
| emily | may be better to backport whatever was needed for the new glibc than to keep following a pre-release | 20:38:43 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | Now that sheds some light! I agree we should not be following pre-releases. I wasn't aware of the details of the numbering scheme and assumed +x would mark some kind of patch version. | 20:49:40 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | Maybe we should add a check that makes sure the tag name ends with -ga | 20:50:14 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | @emilazy:matrix.org I've closed my PR. At the same time I don't see myself backporting a patch that fixes the glibc issue. If anybody else wants to give that a try, feel free. Or we'll just wait until ga is released. | 20:57:20 |
| emily | yeah, it's the most confusing numbering scheme around… | 20:57:45 |
| emily | the JSON files deliberately recall the full tag name to have the canonical version available | 20:57:53 |
| emily | but the update script only updates to final releases | 20:58:00 |
| emily | basically it counts up to +n and then they tag -ga at the same commit as +n | 20:58:38 |
| 1 Apr 2026 |
|  @onur-ozkan:matrix.org left the room. | 08:18:36 |
| 5 Apr 2026 |
 Infinidoge 🏳️⚧️ | Is there anything stopping us from bumping the default JDK package to 25? | 23:03:57 |
 msgilligan | It's been months since I've looked at this, but there were issues when I last checked.
See: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/430389 | 23:06:36 |
| msgilligan | Related stale PRs:
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/443523
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/462041
| 23:07:57 |
| 6 Apr 2026 |
| Infinidoge 🏳️⚧️ | Hmm | 05:11:00 |
| Infinidoge 🏳️⚧️ | At some point will try running nixpkgs-review against a JDK 25 default bump and let the ~1600 packages build | 05:11:28 |
| 7 Apr 2026 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | Hey folks, I think we need to form an opinion on our readiness for 26.05. @NixOS/java has been pinged on the release issue asking for feedback. If everything is good fo 26.05 it's fine to just state that :) | 13:34:07 |
| 8 Apr 2026 |
| Benedikt Ritter (britter) | Okay, so let's do it like this: if I don't hear anything about 26.05 readiness by the end of this week, I will respond that java is ready, ok? Please react with 👍️ or 👎️ | 17:30:26 |
| msgilligan | I'm assuming thumbs-up means I agree to your proposed process, not that I'm saying Java is ready. | 17:44:10 |
