Nix Documentation | 406 Members | |
| Discussion about documentation improvements around the Nix ecosystem | 79 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Mar 2024 | ||
| infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to refences of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling) | 20:12:41 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to refences of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling) | 20:13:21 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to refences of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling) | 20:14:51 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling) | 20:15:33 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code-side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling) | 20:15:43 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code-side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling we cannot create backlinks here anymore) | 20:16:04 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. (Imagine every manual exports its available URL as well as the internal "tags", that could also be referenced from elsewhere in the nix ecosystem) But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code-side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling we cannot create backlinks here anymore) | 20:17:15 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. (Imagine every manual exports its available URLs as well as the internal "tags", that could also be referenced from elsewhere in the nix ecosystem) But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code-side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling we cannot create backlinks here anymore) | 20:17:29 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. (Imagine every manual exports its available URLs as well as the available "tags", that could be referenced from elsewhere in the nix ecosystem) But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code-side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling we cannot create backlinks here anymore) | 20:17:52 | |
| * infinisil: Roughly tracking the following relations:
For each of those we should have some kind of solution. fricklerhandwerk Brought TagRef (concept) to me, which i really like because of its simplicity. (Can solve 2. / maybe 3.) For 1. we have the RFC145 but may need additional extensions for something like: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/b286b8df1c0ecff4baa44a7224282aeccc6695c2/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders/default.nix#L29 Then for 3. I imagine that every of our manuals could export sitemaps (https://www.sitemaps.org/de/protocol.html) Which could be used in conjunction with TagRef. (Imagine every manual exports its available URLs as well as the available "tags", that could be referenced from elsewhere in the nix ecosystem) But regarding this topic i was mainly refering to references of 1. because moving doc-comments out of the source without replacement leaves the code-side of those references untracked. (We don't relly properly track them yet) But its a nice property we kind of "destroyed" here. (At least for automated tooling we cannot create backlinks here anymore) | 20:20:16 | |
| 20:43:02 | ||
| Perhaps there is a simpler explanation of the matter. But so far I haven't managed to formulate it so that it's easier to understand. Feel free to help me 😃 | 21:03:58 | |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki: the problem this tries to solve doesn't seem to have an English term. German: Medienbruch, French: Rupture de média - loosely translated "media discontinuity". Which is that you have information in different substrates that belongs together but there is some annoying technical barrier in between. | 21:40:14 | |