Nix Documentation | 419 Members | |
| Discussion about documentation improvements around the Nix ecosystem | 83 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2023 | ||
| * I have a long post of feedback which tbf is mostly probably stuff we already know, sourced from a friend who just learned NixOS. Is this the right place to put it or should it go on discourse? | 22:04:00 | |
(jade): it sucks that our manual is incredibly anti seo because the fact that it's one massive page is incredibly nice to ctrl f and not have to trust some terrible in-page search engine. but the upgrade ryantm is doing would help here i think.
(jade): especially it's hard to find it in the nix manual and we're doing no favours by having our manuals all separated so that you can't search in one to find things in the other. global search across nix.dev, nix, nixpkgs, and nixos docs would be good maybe?
| 22:09:55 | |
| 17 Oct 2023 | ||
| I'm planning to merge this in one week unless I get feedback about it. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/108063/files it's a fairly self contained change. | 13:20:48 | |
In reply to @ryantm:matrix.orgDoesn't seem that it's been linked to from https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/156309 It's not mdbook but it's about creating a paged docs | 16:49:24 | |
| 19 Oct 2023 | ||
| I'm likely not going to make it to the meeting today. If there is anything anyone really needs to discuss or review or get merged today, please ping me and I will try to arrange it regardless. | 08:14:57 | |
| Today me and henrik-ch started curating the doc team member list: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2023-10-19-documentation-team-meeting-notes-87/34349 | 14:55:27 | |
| henrik-ch: See the edit history of the meeting notes, did minor updates | 14:58:14 | |
| 20 Oct 2023 | ||
| I finally have a PR up for sphinxext-rediraffe: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/262182 | 04:38:16 | |
| 10:34:34 | ||
hey so the docs for fixed-output derivations don't have any direct mention of the fact they enable network access? only implications with the fetchurl example? | 19:33:33 | |
| and that regular derivations don't, at least when the sandbox is enabled which I think is basically always? | 19:35:38 | |
| 21 Oct 2023 | ||
In reply to @ckie:ckie.devYes, apparently. Would you mind adding a sentence that mentions this? | 09:52:09 | |
| If you need some guidance to make the change, check this new page: https://nixos.org/manual/nix/unstable/contributing/documentation It likely wonโt cover everything you need, and Iโd be happy about feedback on how to improve it | 09:53:30 | |
| Is the team aware of this PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/108063? | 14:10:41 | |
| Have been very busy but will be able to review some stuff this weekend | 14:32:26 | |
In reply to @alejandrosame:matrix.orgAware but have no opinion about it. | 16:20:40 | |
| 22 Oct 2023 | ||
In reply to @alejandrosame:matrix.orgI am aware of it - was looking at it at nixcon with ryantm . | 11:29:45 | |
| is there a reason why for the module system, we say "defining an option" instead of "setting an option"? I feel like i have to think a couple seconds every time i read definition/declaration, to remember what each means. this wouldn't happen with setting/declaration | 15:21:40 | |
| 19:44:10 | ||
| 23 Oct 2023 | ||
In reply to @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk Robert Hensing (roberth) wrote a proposal on changing that: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/185234 I think it should be implemented as written. There's a pile of issues on module system docs, this is one of it. | 09:41:45 | |
In reply to @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk* Robert Hensing (roberth) wrote a proposal on changing that: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/185234 I think it should be implemented as written. There's a pile of issues with the module system docs, this is one of it. | 09:42:05 | |
| * Robert Hensing (roberth) wrote a proposal on changing that: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/185234 I think it should be implemented as written. | 09:42:24 | |
| Iโll only be in the meeting for the first half hour today because of a conflicting appointment | 11:16:47 | |
In reply to @fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgthanks! i'ld love to discuss some of this stuff on thu (i can't attend today) | 12:55:00 | |
| oops, was meant as a reply to the post above ๐ | 12:55:11 | |
| 25 Oct 2023 | ||
| 00:13:04 | ||
| I've been upgrading NixOS. On the good side, I've had options that other distros didn't offer but I still broke stuff! Badly! I finally tracked down that "virtualisation.libvirtd.qemu.ovmf.package = pkgs.OVMFFull" updated the version of OVMF_CODE.fd which subsequently caused virtual domains using UEFI to no longer successfully boot. This is likely related to a change in size of the nvram, and starting the domains with the virsh --reset-nvram option allowed them to boot. I also needed to then go into the UEFI config and update the display resolution in order to see the actual boot process. This took hours to work through - is it worth documenting anywhere for others because I couldn't find much. Also I am still on NixOS 22.05 - Trying to get to 23.05, so my issues maybe 'out-of-date' but they got me! | 10:00:05 | |
| fsbof: Sounds like that should be added (if it's not already) to the 23.05 release notes. There's a breaking changes section | 10:02:31 | |
| I did look in the release notes and could only find two mentions of OVMF changes in 22.11 and 21.11 | 10:06:09 | |
| I also managed to break it with out needing to upgrade the NixOS version - just by add the line above to configuration.nix in 22.05 when it previously didn't exist. | 10:08:34 | |