| 28 Jun 2024 |
|  @axiomss:matrix.org left the room. | 04:15:13 |
 Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | xD friday semver checks with infinisil list comprehension method ^^ (Please do not use this)
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 0.9.9 prerelease:build ]
true
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
false
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 release:build ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
true
https://jubianchi.github.io/semver-check/#/^1.0.0-release%2Bbuild/1.0.0-prerelrease%2Bbuild
| 15:45:00 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * xD friday semver checks with infinisil list comprehension method ^^ (Please do not use this)
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 0.9.9 prerelease:build ]
true
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
false
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 release:build ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
true
https://jubianchi.github.io/semver-check/#/^1.0.0-release%2Bbuild/1.0.0-prerelrease%2Bbuild
Would be fun if that worked for semver in general
| 15:45:31 |
 infinisil | Haha nice | 15:46:53 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | This should actually work because. Pre-release and build identifiers are compared lexicographically in ASCII sort order | 15:51:43 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * This should actually work because. Pre-release identifiers are compared lexicographically in ASCII sort order | 15:52:13 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | (Build doesnt affect the order though) | 15:52:26 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * (Build tags doesnt affect the order though) | 15:52:47 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * xD friday semver checks with infinisil list comprehension method ^^ (Please do not use this)
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 0.9.9 prerelease:build ]
true
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
false
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 release:build ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
true
nix-repl> [ 3.1.4 rc:1.0+20230401.build1234 ] < [ 3.1.4 rc:1.1+20230401.build1234 ]
true
nix-repl> [ 3.1.4 rc:1.0+20230401.build1234 ] > [ 3.1.4 rc:1.1+20230401.build1234 ]
false
https://jubianchi.github.io/semver-check/#/^1.0.0-release%2Bbuild/1.0.0-prerelrease%2Bbuild
Would be fun if that worked for semver in general
| 16:01:00 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * (Build tags doesnt affect the order though, thats why i wont work for all cases) | 16:02:32 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * (Build tags doesnt affect the order though, thats why it wont work for all cases) | 16:02:44 |
 purepani | In reply to @johannes.kirschbauer:scs.ems.host
xD friday semver checks with infinisil list comprehension method ^^ (Please do not use this)
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 0.9.9 prerelease:build ]
true
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
false
nix-repl> [ 1.0.0 release:build ] > [ 1.0.0 prerelease:build ]
true
nix-repl> [ 3.1.4 rc:1.0+20230401.build1234 ] < [ 3.1.4 rc:1.1+20230401.build1234 ]
true
nix-repl> [ 3.1.4 rc:1.0+20230401.build1234 ] > [ 3.1.4 rc:1.1+20230401.build1234 ]
false
https://jubianchi.github.io/semver-check/#/^1.0.0-release%2Bbuild/1.0.0-prerelrease%2Bbuild
Would be fun if that worked for semver in general
what on earth ahaha | 17:39:34 |
| 29 Jun 2024 |
|  mib 🥐 joined the room. | 22:24:29 |
| 2 Jul 2024 |
|  Zyansheep joined the room. | 04:36:20 |
|  @fastloris:tchncs.de joined the room. | 11:06:45 |
 fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @fricklerhandwerk:matrix.org
Thanks Stefan Schroeder Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki, I'll take that into account when I get to recording the next thing Here's another video: https://youtu.be/82UxXZv6Vhk
I haven't recorded a new one yet, but I'll incorporate any feedback for the next thing I do
| 13:41:13 |
|  @janik0:matrix.org left the room. | 13:44:11 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | fricklerhandwerk: great video.
🚀
I find it always impressing how you find and fix these little odd things. | 15:31:01 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | Who got commit rights and would like to review a 2k lines changed pr? 😬
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/323843/files | 15:36:41 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | Should i split it? | 15:38:11 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | * Who got commit rights and/or would like to review a 2k lines changed pr? 😬
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/323843/files | 16:05:39 |
 djacu | I don't have commit rights but taking a look.
I'm seeing some things that I can't find in RFC 145. Was the format updated in a another RFC? | 16:12:00 |
| fricklerhandwerk | I can take a look this week, and merge some little fixups on the way | 16:15:49 |
| fricklerhandwerk | Overall it's not that bad, looks pretty mechanical | 16:16:02 |
| fricklerhandwerk | * Overall it's not that bad in terms of size, looks pretty mechanical. | 16:16:12 |
| Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki | djacu: no the RFC is not strict in those terms. danielsidhion and me worked on what is more like conventions. There are other files in lib that use commonmark already in comments for reference | 16:29:54 |
