| 6 Nov 2023 |
 @delroth:delroth.net | # Set a fallback default value for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, used by some build tools
# to provide a deterministic substitute for the "current" time. Note that
# 315532800 = 1980-01-01 12:00:00. We use this date because python's wheel
# implementation uses zip archive and zip does not support dates going back to
# 1970.
export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
: "${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:=315532800}"
| 18:28:44 |
 infinisil | I've drafted a small RFC to use nix.dev as the canonical name (but there's also alternatives), would appreciate some quick feedback: https://github.com/nix-rfc-canonical-domain/rfcs/blob/canonical-domain/rfcs/1000-canonical-domain.md | 20:36:48 |
| infinisil | * I've drafted a small RFC to use nix.dev as the canonical domain name (but there's also alternatives), would appreciate some quick feedback: https://github.com/nix-rfc-canonical-domain/rfcs/blob/canonical-domain/rfcs/1000-canonical-domain.md | 20:37:52 |
 fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
I've drafted a small RFC to use nix.dev as the canonical domain name (but there's also alternatives), would appreciate some quick feedback: https://github.com/nix-rfc-canonical-domain/rfcs/blob/canonical-domain/rfcs/1000-canonical-domain.md There should be very few things that deserve an RFC. This is one of them. | 20:41:34 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | this feels like it should have a mention of the nixos dot com problem :-) | 20:44:40 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | * this RFC feels like it should have a mention of the nixos dot com problem :-) | 20:44:52 |
| fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
this RFC feels like it should have a mention of the nixos dot com problem :-) Right. And if it comes to a conclusion we may want to task the foundation to exercise their trademark rights on that basis. | 20:52:55 |
| infinisil | Btw I also asked in the governance room, where there's some more discussion already: https://matrix.to/#/!VyoUhyWvlhSpFWWxHL:matrix.org/$WUV3OUgwKv_EQkOVQTSOE6WCjbck9oof4nEmzLSy1p8?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=matrix.dapp.org.uk | 20:55:59 |
| 7 Nov 2023 |
|  chreekat left the room. | 06:58:35 |
 asymmetric | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
I've drafted a small RFC to use nix.dev as the canonical domain name (but there's also alternatives), would appreciate some quick feedback: https://github.com/nix-rfc-canonical-domain/rfcs/blob/canonical-domain/rfcs/1000-canonical-domain.md in future work you could list that the implementation of the currently two websites could be unified. or maybe not. but it's a question that i had. you could also declare it as explicitly out of scope. | 10:05:35 |
| infinisil | In reply to @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk
in future work you could list that the implementation of the currently two websites could be unified. or maybe not. but it's a question that i had. you could also declare it as explicitly out of scope. Sounds good, can you PR that? :D | 10:52:14 |
| asymmetric | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Sounds good, can you PR that? :D as future work or as out of scope? | 10:54:21 |
| infinisil | In reply to @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk
as future work or as out of scope? I don't think there's an out of scope section. Future work sounds good | 10:56:06 |
| 8 Nov 2023 |
| fricklerhandwerk | https://discourse.nixos.org/t/a-portable-nix-shell-shebang/35148/2
What do you think? If we want this, anyone interested in seeing it through? | 00:26:48 |
