| 7 Sep 2023 |
 asymmetric | Sure I’m outside | 15:50:15 |
| asymmetric | Leaving now as it’s a bit late, see you there or you catch up? :) | 15:52:41 |
 alejandrosame | I'll catch you on the way | 15:53:18 |
| alejandrosame | No need to wait hehe | 15:53:25 |
| asymmetric | I’ve arrived, you gonna be here soon? | 16:10:03 |
| 10 Sep 2023 |
| asymmetric | New (?) personal Nix (Flakes) documentation project dropped https://nixos-and-flakes.thiscute.world/ | 11:16:47 |
 ryantm | I just updated https://ryantm.github.io/nixpkgs/ going to look through it now. I think https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/108063 is much more palatable to merge into nixpkgs now. It barely touches the /doc folder. | 11:21:22 |
| ryantm | I had to add some extra code to make the evaluation pass. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/108063/commits/0fe30b31435ef2926599de81827d0d4ec25c05db because some (deprecated) library functions print warnings during evaluation. | 15:57:54 |
| 11 Sep 2023 |
 @olafklingt:matrix.org | I started this PR long ago. i looked at it again and i am not sure if it makes sense.
If someone can have a look and give some general comments about what seems valuable to them, I might find the motivation to update it to the current nixos testing interface.
https://github.com/NixOS/nix.dev/pull/305/files | 10:16:28 |
 proofconstruction | Great! Will take a look today | 13:28:31 |
 fricklerhandwerk | Already merged it. Let’s fix forward. 🚀 | 13:56:58 |
 @mightyiam:matrix.org | Update: some progress on the doctester. | 14:02:27 |
| proofconstruction | Anybody joining the meeting this morning? It's open | 14:03:54 |
| fricklerhandwerk | I’ll pass, NixCon recovery period. | 14:05:52 |
| @olafklingt:matrix.org | does the pr/branch preview work already? | 15:54:50 |
| @olafklingt:matrix.org | I opened another pr regarding tests, to propose a client server test.
Its marked as draft because I just wrote it.
But i would like to know if people agree that this would be a good replacement for the current complex example.
https://github.com/NixOS/nix.dev/pull/725
| 16:23:09 |
| asymmetric | Does anyone have feedback on this (upcoming) pr? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...asymmetric:nixpkgs:doc-support-tiers-redux#diff-96cbd30c28f7a0a20494c54ec04b6fd108277f7f7ca3f90e17477825e054f301
It's meant to be a stopgap, while /someone/ figures out the current list of platforms for each of the 7 tiers. I remember such a minimal approach was proposed by infinisil in a team call a few weeks ago
| 16:27:23 |
| asymmetric | * Does anyone have feedback on this (upcoming) pr? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...asymmetric:nixpkgs:doc-support-tiers-redux#diff-96cbd30c28f7a0a20494c54ec04b6fd108277f7f7ca3f90e17477825e054f301
It's meant to be a stopgap, while /someone/ figures out the current list of platforms for each of the 7 tiers. I attempted to do that here but I don't think it will be done anytime soon.
I remember such a minimal approach was proposed by infinisil in a team call a few weeks ago
| 16:30:42 |
| asymmetric | * Does anyone have feedback on this (upcoming) pr? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...asymmetric:nixpkgs:doc-support-tiers-redux
It's meant to be a stopgap, while /someone/ figures out the current list of platforms for each of the 7 tiers. I attempted to do that here but I don't think it will be done anytime soon.
I remember such a minimal approach was proposed by infinisil in a team call a few weeks ago
| 16:31:08 |
 infinisil | asymmetric:
Currently, the x86_64-linux platform receives the highest level of support, meaning that every platform-compatible package in Nixpkgs must successfully build in the Hydra and OfBorg CIs before a package can be introduced or updated.
This doesn't seem right, packages are also allowed to breakn on x86_64-linux
| 16:33:42 |
| infinisil | Otherwise this looks pretty good as a minimal platform documentation to me! | 16:33:57 |
| asymmetric | Good point. How would you describe the support x86_64-linux receives? | 16:35:12 |
| asymmetric | I'll create the PR and tag you, so we can discuss there | 16:44:55 |
| 12 Sep 2023 |
|  @matrixbeit:matrix.org left the room. | 08:30:02 |
|  @adam:robins.wtf changed their display name from adamcstephens (buzz) to adamcstephens 🐝. | 12:22:33 |
| asymmetric | here it is: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/254741 | 12:34:14 |
| asymmetric | PSA: i'm gonna take all the PRs under "postponed" that are merged, and move them to done | 12:44:53 |
| asymmetric | does anything speak against archiving all the done tasks? fricklerhandwerk / zmitchell do you look there sometimes for highlights? Or do you keep manual tabs? | 12:50:42 |
| fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk
does anything speak against archiving all the done tasks? fricklerhandwerk / zmitchell do you look there sometimes for highlights? Or do you keep manual tabs? The monthly updates collect all merged PRs, so we don’t need the closed issues. | 15:09:46 |
| 13 Sep 2023 |
|  @savanni:luminescent-dreams.com joined the room. | 15:41:21 |
