!coeAONBrWyDJnYMbMi:nixos.org

NixOS System Operations

646 Members
About system administration for running NixOS systems in production. Declaratively manage your operations. | Room recommendations: #networking:nixos.org176 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Mar 2024
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa No, esperanto 23:50:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
No, esperanto
ok
23:50:15
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi see we cannot have a conversation23:50:21
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa https://forgejo.org/faq/#where-does-the-name-come-from 23:51:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa pls 23:51:06
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusimage.png
Download image.png
23:51:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusplease23:51:33
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa FAQ wins 23:51:53
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi guess23:51:58
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens I don’t get how it’s not open core? Their answers in the FAQ are….a thing  23:56:18
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusit's not open core because they wrote in the charter they won't do open core23:56:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthus it's not open core23:56:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius * thus it's not open core, by the property of negation23:57:02
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi mean this is a dumb article23:57:18
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusand i thought initially it was another company23:57:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusand it's the TC of Gitea so this is even more ridiculous23:57:28
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens It’s just a paid offering on top of the open source version.  23:57:29
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusmade by a company whose board is the TC of Gitea23:57:45
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthere's no conflict of interest23:57:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusmaybe the true question should be ok23:57:53
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswhat if I send SAML support to Gitea tomorrow?23:57:58
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusdo they accepti t?23:58:01
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius * do they accept it?23:58:04
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens No 23:58:05
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
No
why?
23:58:12
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens I’m sure they’d find some explanation or just ignore it 23:58:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAh yes but then what you are saying is that you already concluded they are of bad faith and clearly planning to just pull the rug23:58:56
8 Mar 2024
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens Yeah probably a bit, based on the moves since the soft fork what forgejo has said about them. I’d be happy to be wrong and see gitea do amazing things. Unfortunately, I’d argue there’s enough examples in the past to suggest things won’t turn back toward community.  00:01:43
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens * Yeah probably a bit, based on the moves since the soft fork and what forgejo has said about them. I’d be happy to be wrong and see gitea do amazing things. Unfortunately, I’d argue there’s enough examples in the past to suggest things won’t turn back toward community.  00:07:21
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
what if I send SAML support to Gitea tomorrow?
looks for a simpler feature and doit 😄
00:15:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10