| 31 Mar 2024 |
 @janik0:matrix.org | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
I tried using it, but secret handling becomes an issue 🙂 how do you do disk state handling with netboot (I'm not sure what the default for this is OTOH) | 23:53:47 |
 raitobezarius | you just join a ceph cluster | 23:54:05 |
| raitobezarius | easy? | 23:54:11 |
 hexa | doesn't necessarily mean you nuke the disks | 23:54:12 |
| hexa | you can serve each machine a dedicated image | 23:54:20 |
| hexa | that knows what to mount where | 23:54:25 |
| hexa | if you really want that | 23:54:28 |
 adamcstephens | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
easy? Joining may be easy. Having ceph on the other hand… | 23:55:15 |
| raitobezarius | honestly you can even do fancier things | 23:55:38 |
| raitobezarius | you can serve one image | 23:55:40 |
| raitobezarius | but it contains N installation scripts | 23:55:44 |
| @janik0:matrix.org | In reply to @janik0:matrix.org
how do you do disk state handling with netboot (I'm not sure what the default for this is OTOH) maybe using ElvishJerricco luks tpm key bundle trick might be a solution for your secret needs with netboot. (that would still require initial bootstraping, but I guess you have that anywhere where secrets are involved) https://github.com/ElvishJerricco/stage1-tpm-tailscale | 23:55:49 |
| raitobezarius | and you can dynamically choose the installation script based on the actual hardware | 23:55:52 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
Joining may be easy. Having ceph on the other hand… :> <: | 23:56:09 |
| @janik0:matrix.org | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
(i win) we aren't playing raito wins, this is not a game ^^ | 23:57:10 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @janik0:matrix.org
we aren't playing raito wins, this is not a game ^^ i'm playing it with hexa | 23:57:28 |
| 1 Apr 2024 |
|  yaya joined the room. | 09:31:05 |
|  Alex K joined the room. | 20:03:37 |
| 2 Apr 2024 |
|  axel 🦀 joined the room. | 01:22:40 |
|  K900 joined the room. | 07:10:12 |
| K900 | How was I not in this room | 07:10:18 |
| K900 | Also I have an actual question | 07:10:25 |
| K900 | Has anyone ever seen fsync EIO on btrfs that otherwise looks perfectly healthy | 07:10:39 |
| K900 | Or am I having my first btrfs moment(tm0 | 07:10:44 |
| K900 | * Or am I having my first btrfs moment(tm) | 07:10:46 |
| hexa | good luck | 07:11:23 |
| K900 | Great | 07:15:14 |
| K900 | Should I just bcachefs migrate it | 07:15:29 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download 1712042128832.jpg | 07:15:32 |
| K900 | And hope at least bcachefs has better logs | 07:15:38 |
