NixOS CUDA | 309 Members | |
| CUDA packages maintenance and support in nixpkgs | https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27/ | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#cuda | 60 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Apr 2026 | ||
| * @[Edward Tjörnhammar] I'm NOT rushing anything. I didn't touch the HPC-specific logic, and the PR is literally open for review. I've already replied to all your concerns in the PR comments. If you genuinely believe HPC is broken by these changes, please quote the exact lines of code on GitHub that cause the issue. Let's keep the discussion technical and factual. | 09:58:20 | |
In reply to @ccicnce113424:matrix.orgThat would be great, I said you risk breaking HPC deployments not that it was a fact, the concerns in my review are my technical and factual concerns. That you adressed my concerns were my main priority since you seemed to want to get this in within the merge window. I will take another look tonight. | 10:38:07 | |
| 12:36:07 | ||
| 14:19:45 | ||
| 21 Apr 2026 | ||
| Hi Samuel Ainsworth! I'm having yet another hash mismatch on | 20:51:35 | |
| 22 Apr 2026 | ||
| Hmm interesting could you send me your deps file again and I can debug? | 00:06:40 | |
| Sure: https://mega.nz/file/PpZDzZqT#oGHHBpawgcbkqtk49FlVv1tL3Nvd4-FhEXZfulvxtfc | 07:11:35 | |
| 23 Apr 2026 | ||
| 09:36:06 | ||
connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8), do you know if libnvvm is a CUDA>=13.0 thing? Or should it also be packaged for 12.9. | 16:18:41 | |
* connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8), do you know if libnvvm is a CUDA>=13.0 thing? Or should it also be packaged for 12.9? | 16:18:49 | |
| * connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8), do you know if It should be... But only the 13.x redist manifests mention it... | 16:21:09 | |
| * connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8), do you know if It should be... But only the 13.x redist manifests mention it... EDIT: It's under | 16:27:19 | |
| Oh my god | 16:28:44 | |
| Oh wait yeah it was bundled with NVCC then was split out into its own library phew | 16:29:05 | |
| IIRC I symlink it into NVCC to avoid breaking consumers? | 16:29:22 | |
| As you say. phew. | 16:31:54 | |
| Raw fun: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/512828 | 16:32:17 | |
| I'd rather change the definition of libnvvm to extract itself from nvcc in cuda<13 and declare that the current interface. | 16:55:27 | |
| The latent concern I have is around packages assuming relative path access to work :( | 18:04:25 | |
| Depending on fu... motivation, this is not necessarily a lost battle;) | 18:44:14 | |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8), I'd like to get this one in if you have a minute: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/512796 | 20:49:46 | |
| 24 Apr 2026 | ||
| 05:39:52 | ||
| Hi all, this might be a stupid question but why do I have to build some packages still locally when on nixos-unstable with This actually hinders me from updating right now because | 10:25:30 | |
| Oh, and I'm sorry if this is the wrong place, I just remembered that there is a forum, duh. | 10:26:21 | |
| Just to sanity check this is when you are using the cache.nixos-cuda.org? | 10:28:10 | |
| Yeah, this is the full relevant code:
| 10:33:53 | |
| Which revision of nixpkgs are you tracking? Torch should be cached: https://hydra.nixos-cuda.org/job/nixos-cuda/cuda-packages-unstable/python313Packages.torch.x86_64-linux | 11:48:59 | |
nixpkgs unstable with ref github:NixOS/nixpkgs/b12141ef619e0a9c1c84dc8c684040326f27cdcc?narHash=sha256-ZSK0NL4a1BwVbbTBoSnWgbJy9HeZFXLYQizjb2DPF24%3D according to nix flake info | 14:31:09 | |
| 19:59:01 | ||
| Is there any remaining blocker? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/498612 | 20:35:23 | |