NixOS CUDA | 288 Members | |
| CUDA packages maintenance and support in nixpkgs | https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27/ | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#cuda | 58 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sep 2025 | ||
You're trying to run tests which require a GPU in the sandbox. Make sure you've enabled the nix-required-mounts NixOS module option (https://search.nixos.org/options?channel=25.05&show=programs.nix-required-mounts.presets.nvidia-gpu.enable&query=nix-required-mounts) and try again. | 23:29:21 | |
| Do you have an example of what you were trying to do previously which wasn't working? | 23:31:08 | |
| 10 Sep 2025 | ||
| 00:35:23 | ||
| softdep issues again? | 00:43:26 | |
| It only ever takes a couple of hours for our hydra to catch up. After the latest staging-next merge and subsequent nixos-unstable-small channel bump it took less than five hours for the full rebuild of the cuda jobset. | 04:06:52 | |
| Here is my first version, before I went ahead and created a PR to add it to upstream nixpkgs: https://git.sr.ht/~albertlarsan68/nur/tree/8fcbc4612bcd097065c5691ca18cbc8f0e0825a0/item/pkgs/xmrig-cuda-mo/default.nix And here is the pr: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441494 | 05:59:05 | |
| Thanks connor (he/him) (UTC+2) . I can now launch the triton test. However, when attempting to launch tests on the
| 07:12:50 | |
| Why shouldn't torch support 3.13? | 07:15:31 | |
| Sorry, tensorflow does not support Python 3.13 | 07:16:41 | |
| How can I get the passthru tests use the Python interpreter specified ? | 07:20:59 | |
| connor (he/him) (UTC+2): are 7AM (2PM UTC) meetings still OK for you? Would you like to reschedule to a different time? We could have Kevin Mittman join us the next time or other | 07:48:33 | |
| Oh cool, I wonder if this is the 1st project consuming cuda or torch via meson i nixpkgs | 07:52:33 | |
| AFAIK NVIDIA has never had any objections to ZLUDA, only AMD did | 07:55:35 | |
| I managed to launch a test on my package with CUDA enabled, but I get an issue from
I share my work in progress in a draft PR here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441728 | 09:59:29 | |
In reply to @hugo:okeso.euAt the very least we recently stopped early-binding rocm libraries, maybe hard-coded compiler paths went with them. Try giving it a compiler at test time as suggested in the error? | 10:05:31 | |
| I (vibe) tried to give it a compiler here in this commit https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441728/commits/81f7997ca1ca37193f2f26fdbc85c586a92ba6dd but was unsuccessful. Any suggestion how to do that? | 10:06:58 | |
| 15:02:50 | ||
| That should only impact ROCm unless I messed it up! diff was https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/c74e5ffb6526ac1b4870504921b9ba9362189a17 | 15:52:00 | |
| 18:26:24 | ||
| Is this team involved in flox/nvidia partnership ? (See https://flox.dev/cuda/) I guess so since the nixos foundation also is, but there is no mention of this team or its amazing work. | 18:30:16 | |
| 19:53:26 | |
| After a whole day recompiling torch :) | 19:53:32 | |
| Actually, with the HSA override to 11.0.0 it worked, but I get a different kind of error
| 19:58:53 | |
| * Actually, with the HSA override to 11.0.0 it worked, but I get a different kind of error
| 19:59:14 | |
In reply to @layus:matrix.orgRon mentioned them here https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nix-flox-nvidia-opening-up-cuda-redistribution-on-nix/69189/7 | 20:01:06 | |
| Is there a rocm room? | 20:54:56 | |
| https://matrix.to/#/#ROCm:nixos.org | 21:40:38 | |
| 22:20:37 | ||
| Well done guys for allowing this to happen (connor (he/him) (UTC-7) SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) stick...) 👏 | 23:07:17 | |
| * Well done guys for allowing this to happen (connor (he/him) (UTC-7) SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) stick Samuel Ainsworth...) 👏 | 23:22:06 | |