!eWOErHSaiddIbsUNsJ:nixos.org

NixOS CUDA

290 Members
CUDA packages maintenance and support in nixpkgs | https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27/ | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#cuda57 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
15 Jan 2026
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/480103 introduces reintroduces libtensorflow-bin at 2.18.1, if anyone here cares for that15:15:35
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa

Note: Publishing standalone libtensorflow packages was dropped in TensorFlow 2.19.0, so the binary version used in this package is the latest one.

15:16:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaah sure, that's why we package an outdated release 😬15:16:18
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him)Goddamn stubs and transitive symbol resolution17:33:35
* @connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him) grumbles17:33:39
16 Jan 2026
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him)PR to avoid rebuilding Nix itself whenever CUDA support is enabled: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/48052400:01:13
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanix depends on onetbb?00:09:53
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him)Yes, IIRC at least through blake302:23:54
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him) hexa (UTC+1): any additional thoughts on merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/480524? 18:16:50
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanone18:30:44
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadidn't test anything18:30:47
@hexa:lossy.networkhexajust disables cuda support18:30:55
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawhat could go wrong?18:31:03
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix)Wait, globally?20:00:50
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix)This probably affects MPI and SLURM, and might be one of those libraries you're actually supposed to link dynamically and not how we do it20:26:15
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him)I don't follow; IIRC hwloc is pulled in by those directly and would use it untouched22:48:00
17 Jan 2026
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage FYI, the onnxruntime bump was merged! 🎉
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/450587
09:33:45
@kaya:catnip.eekaya 𖤐Hey. Im working on upstreaming packages for exllama & tabbyapi. I would appreciate if somebody from here could review the PR :) https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/48112119:11:25
18 Jan 2026
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage Anyone could give a second opinion on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/474676 please? 09:48:06
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix)This particular regression could've been avoided with autopatchelf. Maybe switch to that?12:08:40
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage Just adding autoPatchelfHook you mean? 22:29:11
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix)And removing --set-rpath23:40:44
20 Jan 2026
@kaya:catnip.eekaya 𖤐 Gaétan Lepage: Thank you for the through PR review, much appreciated! 19:03:45
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageYou're welcome! I'll probably wait for a second committer to double check, but we should be able to merge it soon :)19:26:32
21 Jan 2026
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (he/him) Gaétan Lepageif you haven’t already, can you link any of the additional work you’ve had to do for the OpenCV version bump in the PR description? I remember yesterday you had mentioned needing to fix protobuf, but that might have been about ONNX Runtime. 17:20:11
4 Aug 2022
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her) joined the room.03:26:42
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)(hi, just came here to read + respond to this.)03:28:52
@tpw_rules:matrix.orgtpw_ruleshey. i had previously sympathzied with samuela and like i said before had some of the same frustrations. i just edited my github comment to add "[CUDA] packages are universally complicated, fragile to package, and critical to daily operations. Nix being able to manage them is unbelievably helpful to those of us who work with them regularly, even if support is downgraded to only having an expectation of function on stable branches."03:29:14
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)
In reply to @tpw_rules:matrix.org
i'm mildly peeved about a recent merging of something i maintain where i'm pretty sure the merger does not own the expensive hardware required to properly test the package. i don't think it broke anything but i was given precisely 45 minutes to see the notification before somebody merged it
ugh, 45 minutes? that's... not great. not to air dirty laundry but did you do what samuela did in the wandb PR and at least say that that wasn't a great thing to do? (not sure how else to word that, you get what i mean)
03:30:23
@tpw_rules:matrix.orgtpw_rulesno, i haven't yet, but i probably will03:31:03

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9