| 12 Apr 2026 |
|  kaya 𖤐 changed their profile picture. | 05:53:35 |
|  leona changed their profile picture. | 12:15:52 |
| 14 Apr 2026 |
 danielrf | connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8): TensorRT support in onnxruntime. It pretty much just works if you turn on support for it: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/509976 | 13:40:27 |
| 15 Apr 2026 |
|  John D joined the room. | 22:22:58 |
| 16 Apr 2026 |
 ccicnce113424 | Redacted or Malformed Event | 01:14:52 |
| ccicnce113424 | * I'm using the latest version of nixos-unstable and noticed that Firefox isn't being cached. I checked your Hydra and found that the last successful evaluation for cuda-packages-unstable occurred on April 1; the most recent evaluation processes all ended prematurely. | 01:29:07 |
| ccicnce113424 | * I checked your Hydra and found that the last successful evaluation for cuda-packages-unstable occurred on April 1; the most recent evaluation processes all ended prematurely. | 01:29:34 |
 jaredmontoya | I tried to update to the latest nixos-unstable but thunderbird seems to not be in cache.nixos-cuda.org (and I can't build it because it sems to need more than 64GB RAM to build) did anyone else experience this? | 13:33:23 |
 hexa |
more than 64 GB
| 13:34:23 |
| hexa | that seems unlikely | 13:34:26 |
| hexa | https://hydra.nixos-cuda.org/jobset/nixos-cuda/cuda-packages-unstable#tabs-evaluations | 13:35:18 |
| hexa | the last eval was two weeks ago | 13:35:24 |
 Robbie Buxton | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
that seems unlikely Idk I’ve oomed on packages with over 1TB of ram | 13:36:51 |
| hexa | wat\ | 13:37:01 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 13:37:03 |
 nim65s | but you build with how many cores? | 13:37:23 |
| hexa | a) you can run out of ram with exccessive cores | 13:37:29 |
| nim65s | * but you build with how many cores ? | 13:37:31 |
| hexa | b) without excessive cores the most ram usage is during linking | 13:37:38 |
| hexa | I'd say firefox takes at most 40 GB to link | 13:37:55 |
| Robbie Buxton | I was using nixbuild.net and it kept sizing it up and giving it more cores, and yeah the solution was reducing cores obviously | 13:38:02 |
| hexa | that's not friendly at all, but does fit on my desktop still | 13:38:12 |
| hexa | but that means your core/ram balance was way off | 13:38:28 |
| Robbie Buxton | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
but that means your core/ram balance was way off How so? | 13:39:20 |
| hexa | you have a base need of RAM per core | 13:39:51 |
| hexa | just to run the build on it | 13:39:58 |
| hexa | and if you oom the total cores probably needed more ram than what was provided | 13:40:17 |
| hexa | and the solution would have been to get fewer cores with more ram instead | 13:40:30 |
| Robbie Buxton | Idk I can’t get more than 1.6 TB of ram on AWS 😁 | 13:40:42 |
| hexa | now I don't know anything about how nixbuild.net does scaling | 13:40:56 |
