!eWOErHSaiddIbsUNsJ:nixos.org

NixOS CUDA

287 Members
CUDA packages maintenance and support in nixpkgs | https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27/ | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#cuda58 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Dec 2025
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix) I'm afraid even NixOS cannot fixes all of NVIDIA's problems 16:24:07
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix) * I'm afraid even NixOS cannot fix all of NVIDIA's problems 16:24:14
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix)Best if you have an integrated graphics to keep your display on...16:25:23
@justbrowsing:matrix.orgKevin Mittman (EOY sleep)I use swaywm with --unsupported-gpu (though not on nixos)16:39:04
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageSame16:51:42
19 Dec 2025
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowskisorry if this has been discussed before, but looking at https://hydra.nix-community.org/jobset/nixpkgs/cuda-stable#tabs-evaluations the last Job I'm seeing was a week ago. I thought this jobset was following nixos-unstable-small (although now that I've checked, it's nixos-25.05-small)16:11:35
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowskicuda-job.png
Download cuda-job.png
16:11:36
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowski* sorry if this has been discussed before, but looking at https://hydra.nix-community.org/jobset/nixpkgs/cuda-stable#tabs-evaluations the last Job I'm seeing was a week ago. I thought this jobset was following nixos-unstable-small (although now that I've checked, it's nixos-25.05-small). Has something happened that stopped it from running? 16:12:19
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage

Hi!
nix-community does not build anything cuda-related anymore.
We are now testing and building packages on our own infra:

We build packages for both the unstable channel and the latest stable nixpkgs channel.

16:19:44
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowskiawesome, thanks!17:00:29
@m3l6h:matrix.orgm3l6h joined the room.17:35:43
@aliarokapis:matrix.orgAlexandros LiarokapisDoes anyone know of a good solution to making nix built oci containers usable on systems with nvidia container toolkit installed? Making /run/opengl/drivers etc to work with the mounted paths and all that I mean.19:04:15
@apyh:matrix.orgapyhoh yeah, i run everything thru nix-gl-host19:05:36
@apyh:matrix.orgapyhwe're using it in prod, seems to work great19:05:46
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowskiDoes anyone have some tips regarding automatically bumping nixpkgs in a repo which depends on cuda cache? The idea is to only bump to latest commit from nixos-unstable-small once it's been built by the cuda jobset 19:08:17
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage It's just an idea for now, but long-term, I would like us to have nixos-unstable-cuda and nixos-25.11-cuda channels that have their specific channel blockers.
People will be able to follow these channels knowing that they will have reliable cache hits.
20:06:26
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowskiThat would be great! 20:09:18
@m3l6h:matrix.orgm3l6h set a profile picture.23:39:03
@m3l6h:matrix.orgm3l6h changed their profile picture.23:39:11
@justbrowsing:matrix.orgKevin Mittman (EOY sleep) changed their display name from Kevin Mittman (UTC-7) to Kevin Mittman (EOY sleep).23:58:45
20 Dec 2025
@etehtsea:matrix.orgkis-kis joined the room.07:29:33
@le-chat:matrix.orgle-chat I'm just copying/symlinking something like libcuda* lib*nvidia* libnv* from the directory where the toolkit put them.
Once upon a time I've been required (for trtexec) to run patchelf --add-rpath /run/opengl-driver/lib on these copies, but that was on older Nixos, I don't know if it's necessary now.
19:24:19
21 Dec 2025
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix)s/idea for now/idea for the past 4+ years that keeps running into penny counting and compliance excuses/ Ftfy01:23:14
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowski
In reply to @ss:someonex.net
s/idea for now/idea for the past 4+ years that keeps running into penny counting and compliance excuses/
Ftfy
Yeah, @glepage:matrix.org: why not now?
09:01:01
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageWell, because we unfortunately are quite busy with a lot of maintenance work. It is hard to find some time to work on those more long-term projects.09:32:42
@adrian-gierakowski:matrix.orgadrian-gierakowski
In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
Well, because we unfortunately are quite busy with a lot of maintenance work. It is hard to find some time to work on those more long-term projects.
I'd be happy to help if there is anything I could do to speed this up.
12:00:04
4 Aug 2022
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her) joined the room.03:26:42
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)(hi, just came here to read + respond to this.)03:28:52
@tpw_rules:matrix.orgtpw_ruleshey. i had previously sympathzied with samuela and like i said before had some of the same frustrations. i just edited my github comment to add "[CUDA] packages are universally complicated, fragile to package, and critical to daily operations. Nix being able to manage them is unbelievably helpful to those of us who work with them regularly, even if support is downgraded to only having an expectation of function on stable branches."03:29:14
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)
In reply to @tpw_rules:matrix.org
i'm mildly peeved about a recent merging of something i maintain where i'm pretty sure the merger does not own the expensive hardware required to properly test the package. i don't think it broke anything but i was given precisely 45 minutes to see the notification before somebody merged it
ugh, 45 minutes? that's... not great. not to air dirty laundry but did you do what samuela did in the wandb PR and at least say that that wasn't a great thing to do? (not sure how else to word that, you get what i mean)
03:30:23

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9