| 6 Feb 2025 |
 SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) |
does it mean that individual derivations from cudaPackages.* should be manually added to buildInputs/nativeBuildInputs. For example, would this mean that I should just manually add cuda_nvcc to nativeBuildInputs?
That's the idea. We could consider an automation more along the lines of propagatedBuildInputs, but symlinks we hope to avoid, because it's hard to prune the references to static libraries after the build
| 17:31:10 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | Maybe gc it? | 17:31:58 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) |
4s
Run # Get the latest eval.yml workflow run for the PR's target commit
Comparing against "https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/13155928895"
Workflow was not successful (conclusion: failure), cannot make comparison
Has anyone encountered this? I've no idea what this workflow is even for
| 17:41:42 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (Gand St. Pieters) to SomeoneSerge (UTC+U[-12,12]). | 17:51:07 |
 ruro | The upstream in question is NVIDIA/cuda-samples. They are currently using "plain" Makefiles. I think that it's unlikely that we could get them to switch (and I don't really want to try to implement this myself). What would be "the most nixpkgs way" to create a merged CUDA_PATH in this case? | 17:54:37 |
| ruro | Apart from just using cudatoolkit that is. | 17:55:17 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | It would be what you said, buildEnv/symlinkJoin (which is what cudaPackages.cudatoolkit currently is) | 17:55:50 |
| ruro | Hmmm. I just noticed that according to this page the latest supported GCC version for CUDA 12.4 is GCC 13.2, but currently
cudaPackages_12_4.backendStdenv.cc.version == "13.3.0"
is this expected?
| 18:57:21 |
| ruro | Nvm, I am blind, it says that newer minor versions are also supported. | 19:02:35 |
| 7 Feb 2025 |
 connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Ugh FINALLY have a test to catch different versions of the package set leaking into each other: https://github.com/ConnorBaker/cuda-packages/commit/6c9cb3a17962427e9772849a3b7ca08899897aae
Got tried of seeing multiple versions of CUDA dependencies in the closure of members of the package set | 02:04:37 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | Let's do Thursday February 13th 2-3PM UTC? | 14:41:38 |
 stick | no idea - seems like an intermittent issue? | 15:07:19 |
| stick | other than that, are you ok with merging the PR? I would love vllm to appear in the cache | 15:07:44 |
| stick | * other than that, are you ok with merging the PR? I would love vllm to appear in the nix-community cache | 15:07:50 |
| stick | and i just merged an update from 0.7.1 -> 0.7.2 to master | 15:08:02 |
| stick | i rebased the PR to check whether the CI fails again on the same test | 15:09:55 |
| stick | * i rebased the PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/379575 to check whether the CI fails again on the same test | 15:10:13 |
| stick | update: no it did not - i guess there was an error in master, not in my branch | 15:11:22 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | Yes ofc. I was about to press the button but then this weird action failed even after I restarted it manually | 15:23:31 |
| stick | is that the only thing needed to get vllm into nix-community cache? | 15:23:58 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | Looks like it's happy after the rebase? | 15:24:01 |
| stick | yes, it is | 15:24:09 |
| stick | thanks for the merge! | 15:33:11 |
| 8 Feb 2025 |
|  terrorjack joined the room. | 01:25:30 |
| terrorjack set a profile picture. | 02:24:20 |
| terrorjack removed their profile picture. | 02:24:57 |
|  vanishingideal joined the room. | 04:06:53 |
|  @mabau:matrix.org left the room. | 07:11:39 |
 zopieux | alright, we got a recent build, so I tried again. Updated to 550e11f and ran:
$ colmena build -v --show-trace --nix-option builders "" --nix-option cores 0
x | these 11 derivations will be built:
x | /nix/store/f1s6y83hb8gdl0s49vmj0w54i5a75gd7-ollama-0.5.7.drv
x | /nix/store/fpfv7cn50ns667qrkwx2frn26di1hnc7-ollama.service.drv
[snip]
x | building '/nix/store/f1s6y83hb8gdl0s49vmj0w54i5a75gd7-ollama-0.5.7.drv'...
even though f1s6… is right there. Is there a way to debug that nix-community is even being requested at all, perhaps?
| 15:36:58 |
| zopieux | ok that was dumb, I should have checked nix flake show first. Something was overriding the substituters this whole time, despite my flake setting them. Sorry for the noise, it's all fine now! | 16:02:13 |
