!eWOErHSaiddIbsUNsJ:nixos.org

NixOS CUDA

288 Members
CUDA packages maintenance and support in nixpkgs | https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27/ | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#cuda56 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
14 Dec 2024
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan then it will depend on the importer.. but then I can't just have people nix run my attributes, they will have to write their own flake to consume, and specify the support in their own flake (which imo is not ideal) 20:53:50
@sielicki:matrix.orgsielicki nix run --impure should check the users ~/.config/nixpkgs file and do the right thing around nonFree and/or cudaSupport/rocmSupport. If you want to add separate imports of nixpkgs for your checks that's one thing but principally I think you should just expose a single package 20:55:40
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanI'm not sure why I'd want a flake on GitHub that reads from the user's home directory at evaluation time.20:58:31
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan I'd just want packages.x86_64-linux.{nvidia-myapp,rocm-myapp} 20:59:11
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan In theory, is there not a stub we could use to make it gpuSupport = true ? 21:51:35

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9