| 30 Nov 2024 |
 sielicki | * pkgs/os-specific/linux/nvidia-x11/open.nix presently does not ship Module.symvers in $dev, which is necessary to package other out-of-tree modules that want to consume symbols from it.
creating the output and installing it is simple enough, but it's not clear to me how that ought to be consumed. If another kmod derivation takes nvidia_x11 as an input, it's just always going to point to nvidiaPackages.stable.
is it correct that I'd need to essentially put any consuming kmod as an attribute nested beneath nvidia_x11? ie: adjacent to nvidia_x11.open?
| 10:39:18 |
| sielicki | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/360375/commits | 11:01:00 |
 SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | Ah, I was just commenting on that on github. I think open being a passthru of nvidia_x11 is a constant source of confusion and we should just move it out to nvidiaPackages. AFAIU the only way open depends on nvidia_x11 is for version numbers... | 13:00:29 |
| 2 Dec 2024 |
 hexa | Gaétan Lepage: so when are we killing the tests on tensordict? | 00:53:22 |
 Gaétan Lepage | :') | 07:24:29 |
| Gaétan Lepage | At least the blocking one I guess | 07:24:35 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Should be fixed by https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/361008. | 07:57:50 |
| Gaétan Lepage | In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
Should be fixed by https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/361008. I went through both tensordict and torchrl. They should be more robust now. | 14:06:35 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Well, it's still not perfect hexa (UTC+1).
On the flaky Threadripper 3990X system, torchrl segfaults after the test suite has passed. It only occurs for python312Packages.torchrl but not for python311Packages.torchrl... | 14:40:15 |
| Gaétan Lepage | 
Download clipboard.png | 14:40:51 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Of course, it builds perfectly fine on two other AMD systems (Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 9 3900) | 14:41:38 |
| hexa | microcode updates applied? | 14:42:05 |
| Gaétan Lepage | I forgot how to check that | 14:42:35 |
| Gaétan Lepage | I think you told me a while ago | 14:42:47 |
| hexa | intel be like | 14:43:46 |
| hexa |
[ 0.000000] microcode: updated early: 0xc6 -> 0xf8, date = 2024-02-01
| 14:43:51 |
| hexa | dmesg | grep microcode | 14:44:36 |
| Gaétan Lepage | [ 2.153548] microcode: microcode updated early to new patch_level=0x0830107b
| 14:45:07 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Nothing matches on my Ryzen system. | 14:46:03 |
| Gaétan Lepage | * TR system:
[ 2.153548] microcode: microcode updated early to new patch_level=0x0830107b
| 14:46:09 |
| Gaétan Lepage | * TR system:
[ 2.153548] microcode: microcode updated early to new patch_level=0x0830107b
...
[ 2.154392] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.2.
| 14:46:30 |
| hexa | ❯ ./amd_ucode_info.py kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
Microcode patches in kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin:
Family=0x10 Model=0x02 Stepping=0x03: Patch=0x01000083 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x02 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x01000083 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x02 Stepping=0x0a: Patch=0x01000084 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x06 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x010000c7 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x04 Stepping=0x03: Patch=0x010000c8 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x06 Stepping=0x03: Patch=0x010000c8 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x05 Stepping=0x03: Patch=0x010000c8 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x08 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x010000d9 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x09 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x010000d9 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x08 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x010000da Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x04 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x010000db Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x05 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x010000db Length=960 bytes
Family=0x10 Model=0x0a Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x010000dc Length=960 bytes
Family=0x11 Model=0x03 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x02000032 Length=512 bytes
Family=0x12 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x03000027 Length=960 bytes
Family=0x14 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x05000029 Length=1568 bytes
Family=0x14 Model=0x02 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x05000119 Length=1568 bytes
Microcode patches in kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin+0x318c:
Family=0x15 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x0600063e Length=2592 bytes
Family=0x15 Model=0x02 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x06000852 Length=2592 bytes
Family=0x15 Model=0x10 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x06001119 Length=2592 bytes
Microcode patches in kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin+0x5050:
Family=0x16 Model=0x00 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x0700010f Length=3458 bytes
Microcode patches in kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin+0x5e06:
Family=0x17 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x0800126f Length=3200 bytes
Family=0x17 Model=0x31 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x0830107c Length=3200 bytes
Family=0x17 Model=0x08 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x0800820d Length=3200 bytes
Family=0x17 Model=0xa0 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x08a00008 Length=3200 bytes
Microcode patches in kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin+0x9082:
Family=0x19 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x00: Patch=0x0a00107a Length=5568 bytes
Family=0x19 Model=0x11 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x0a101248 Length=5568 bytes
Family=0x19 Model=0xa0 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x0aa00215 Length=5568 bytes
Family=0x19 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x02: Patch=0x0a001238 Length=5568 bytes
Family=0x19 Model=0x11 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x0a101148 Length=5568 bytes
Family=0x19 Model=0x01 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x0a0011d5 Length=5568 bytes
Family=0x19 Model=0xa0 Stepping=0x01: Patch=0x0aa00116 Length=5568 bytes
| 14:52:33 |
| hexa | this is the latest ucode for amd on nixpkgs master | 14:52:39 |
| hexa | so 0x19 is family 25 | 14:53:59 |
| hexa | and for the model you probably have to binary or your model with 0xa0 if it is > 17 | 14:54:27 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Ok, so anyway the issues are not a problem of the python package then | 15:11:51 |
| 4 Dec 2024 |
 Kevin Mittman (UTC-8) | Anyone planning to attend PlanetNix https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/22x/events/planet-nix ? Looks like CFP is still open | 02:21:01 |
 connor (he/him) | I probably will; I'm also planning to submit two talks | 04:38:33 |
| 6 Dec 2024 |
|  vannagamma joined the room. | 00:01:17 |
| connor (he/him) | Does anyone have a NixOS system they recommend using to test eval performance? | 05:49:07 |
