!eWOErHSaiddIbsUNsJ:nixos.org

NixOS CUDA

310 Members
CUDA packages maintenance and support in nixpkgs | https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27/ | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#cuda61 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 Jun 2024
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (UTC+1)make sure your libraries build on python3.12, we're switching to 3.12 as the primary python version in this cycle18:19:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (UTC+1)like faiss https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/31319218:22:23
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage What do you think about marking torchWithRocm as broken ?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/318338
21:14:07
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage It would sanitize the nixpkgs-review output for the torch update 21:14:57
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes)
In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
What do you think about marking torchWithRocm as broken ?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/318338
Didn't read but imo yes,this just adds knowledge, and they.should unmark it once it's ffixed
21:30:28
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage
In reply to @ss:someonex.net
Didn't read but imo yes,this just adds knowledge, and they.should unmark it once it's ffixed
Yes, I agree. It makes things clearer
21:36:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (UTC+1)there were two rocm maintainers some time ago22:34:09
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (UTC+1)ideally they would chime in and clarify their commitment22:34:18
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
make sure your libraries build on python3.12, we're switching to 3.12 as the primary python version in this cycle
Oof does PyTorch Dynamo even work with 3.12 yet? I haven’t checked since 2.1 I think
23:05:58
9 Jun 2024
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) Hmm there's a PR starting with python3Packages.torch: but Ofborg didn't try building it, just shows 20 green (eval&c) checks 00:36:09
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)
In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
connor (he/him) (UTC-5), in case you have a bit of available CPU time, could you please run a nixpkgs-review pr --post-result 317576 ?
(If you don't to that's fine ofc)
Rerunning it by the way; got stuck for 20h+ on tensordict’s checkPhase :/
04:05:26
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage
In reply to @connorbaker:matrix.org
Rerunning it by the way; got stuck for 20h+ on tensordict’s checkPhase :/
Thanks. The tensordict problematic problematic test has been disabled in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/318111
07:47:15
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage I now get stuck on python312Packages.botorch 07:47:27
@shekhinah:she.khinah.xyzshekhinah removed their display name she⯰khinah - traumaturgische Beratung.16:57:35
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)I have a custom config I use specifically for nixpkgs-review you may like17:59:18
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)https://gist.github.com/ConnorBaker/305b1aebd7ee74a258a616bbbd4dcd7b17:59:55
@shekhinah:she.khinah.xyzshekhinah changed their profile picture.18:04:55
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage
In reply to @connorbaker:matrix.org
I have a custom config I use specifically for nixpkgs-review you may like
Wow
18:07:32
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageSo botorch did build for you ?18:07:41
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)Yeah it did after I disabled checks for it18:15:10
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) Just posted three variations of nixpkgs-review on the PR, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317576 18:15:45
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)Looks good to me!18:15:49
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)I'm going to try a run with nix-cuda-test real quick18:16:02
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageThank you so much !18:16:45
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepageyes, for me it hangs in the tests...18:16:54
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage If this is not the case on master we should probably investigate that ?
Anyway, considering that a vast majority of the downstream packages do still build fine, I would argue for merging this PR.
18:17:49
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage As a more general thought, I find very important to mark broken packages as such as it prevents us from diving in the nixpkgs-review failures every time to investigate whether a breakage is a regression or not. 18:18:53
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)Agreed; I can't do it fast enough which is why I've just got that config I use18:25:26
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) If I succeed in running nix-cuda-test, are you okay with me merging it? 18:30:56
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage
In reply to @connorbaker:matrix.org
If I succeed in running nix-cuda-test, are you okay with me merging it?
Yes, I am OK with it.
19:22:14

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9