| 24 May 2024 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | They're basically not, other than: stable storage and doesn't compete for RAM | 21:23:18 |
 SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | Ok how do you use them? | 21:23:52 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | * Ok how do you use them? | 21:24:06 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bcachefs -- yeah, I live on the edge 🙈
They're the "SSD" in front of my actual SSDs | 21:28:12 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Again, I have done no benchmarking and perceptually, there's no difference. | 21:28:50 |
 aidalgol | SomeoneSerge (UTC+3): Also, what should I do about backporting that PR since the automatic process for doing that failed? | 21:32:42 |
 connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | SomeoneSerge (UTC+3): they're basically (slow) non-volatile RAM. Intel initially tried to position it in the datacenter as a tier between fast disks and RAM but it kind of flopped :l
the 4k random read/write is still the best on the market though | 21:33:19 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Philip Taron (UTC-8): I was looking at the p5800x, which unfortunately doesn't go for that amount :f | 21:35:05 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Oh yeah, those don't need the crazy software hacks to be made use of like the raw "here's a tiny bit of optane" ones do. | 21:36:21 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | In reply to @aidalgol:matrix.org
SomeoneSerge (UTC+3): Also, what should I do about backporting that PR since the automatic process for doing that failed? You can just follow the instructions posted by the bot and ping me for the merge | 21:39:28 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | In reply to @philiptaron:matrix.org
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bcachefs -- yeah, I live on the edge 🙈
They're the "SSD" in front of my actual SSDs I seeeeeeeeeeeeeee | 21:40:39 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | In reply to @connorbaker:matrix.org
SomeoneSerge (UTC+3): they're basically (slow) non-volatile RAM. Intel initially tried to position it in the datacenter as a tier between fast disks and RAM but it kind of flopped :l
the 4k random read/write is still the best on the market though Yes, conceptually this is clear. Putting this into practice is what sounds non-trivial | 21:41:53 |
| aidalgol | I don't understand what happened here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/9230354336/job/25398415658 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/9230354050/job/25398414515#step:3:102 | 22:02:21 |
| 25 May 2024 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | In reply to @aidalgol:matrix.org
I don't understand what happened here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/9230354336/job/25398415658 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/9230354050/job/25398414515#step:3:102 Hmmm, maybe we merged the previous PR unformatted, and the action is confused about the list split into lines in the backport? | 08:19:07 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) |
Note this should not necessarily be treated as a hard fail, but a reviewer's attention should be drawn to it and github actions have no way of doing that but to raise a 'failure'
🤔 | 08:19:33 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | I've never encountered this | 08:19:36 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/d091b7f681e8e5c21947e5de45b7f397a57011ae/maintainers/scripts/check-cherry-picks.sh#L52-L59
I still fail to understand what is it exactly that warrants inspection | 08:57:17 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) | Oh mornings are hard | 08:57:29 |
| aidalgol | A comment for the conditional on line 52 would help a lot. | 09:15:25 |
| aidalgol | Header comment:
# Find alleged cherry-picks
But... why?
| 09:16:13 |
| aidalgol | What is the purpose of this check?? | 09:16:25 |
| 29 May 2024 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | is it irritating to anyone else that nixpkgs-review uses allowBroken = true | 02:01:43 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Similar to OfBorg, that means we can't guard broken evaluations behind meta.broken | 02:04:58 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | I only mention that because I just ran into evaluation errors which should be prevented by https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/e8dbfc07e54c5b477e95dac72b8153e381b0f840 where I'm using a newer version of CUDA and the attribute set doesn't have a binary release for that version so the lookup fails. | 02:05:48 |
 Gaétan Lepage | I am not sure to get that connor (he/him) (UTC-5).
For me, nixpkgs-review is not attempting to build packages marked as broken. Is that what you meant ? | 05:55:45 |
| Gaétan Lepage | tf2onnx> Found duplicated packages in closure for dependency 'protobuf':
tf2onnx> protobuf 4.24.4 (/nix/store/8g2k3idj2f4kbvra98clakdlcvsy6f2y-python3.11-protobuf-4.24.4)
tf2onnx> dependency chain:
tf2onnx> this derivation: /nix/store/r9fq9spwzn87ad0k4npbw487q2zbgryx-python3.11-tf2onnx-1.16.1
tf2onnx> ...depending on: /nix/store/73g093ny57lfgnrbx6lmvphj8y7j5826-python3.11-onnx-1.15.0
tf2onnx> ...depending on: /nix/store/8g2k3idj2f4kbvra98clakdlcvsy6f2y-python3.11-protobuf-4.24.4
tf2onnx> protobuf 4.21.12 (/nix/store/2lk63v57qnqp8n3ydvx0ja61ij2bxv35-python3.11-protobuf-4.21.12)
tf2onnx> dependency chain:
tf2onnx> this derivation: /nix/store/r9fq9spwzn87ad0k4npbw487q2zbgryx-python3.11-tf2onnx-1.16.1
tf2onnx> ...depending on: /nix/store/kngclwr5xpl63vwccpj05drfg60nfh5b-python3.11-tensorflow-2.13.0
tf2onnx> ...depending on: /nix/store/2lk63v57qnqp8n3ydvx0ja61ij2bxv35-python3.11-protobuf-4.21.12
🫠🫠🫠| 09:12:29 |
| Gaétan Lepage | -> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/315568 | 09:17:46 |
|  @nscnt:matrix.org joined the room. | 15:12:56 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
I am not sure to get that connor (he/him) (UTC-5).
For me, nixpkgs-review is not attempting to build packages marked as broken. Is that what you meant ? https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/blob/14339add462bfb5f3181979899debe62d97325ce/nixpkgs_review/buildenv.py#L23-L46 | 17:54:37 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | I rented a Hetzner server to host cantcache.me... their 7950x3D idles about 15C hotter than mine | 19:33:01 |
