| 24 Nov 2025 |
yorik.sar | Is there some place where these points are expanded? Like what means “e.g. cudb” there, for example? | 16:40:12 |
yorik.sar | Ok, will do! | 16:40:18 |
SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | A scattering of PRs and issues on GitHub, but say are you free to join us tomorrow 21:15 CET (20:15 UTC)? We try to sync every Tuesdays by video | 16:55:55 |
SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | * A scattering of PRs and issues on GitHub, but say are you free to join us tomorrow 21:15 CET (20:15 UTC)? We try to sync every Tuesday by video | 16:56:12 |
yorik.sar | Sure, I could join. | 17:00:21 |
SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) Gaétan Lepage doing same time as last week right? | 17:08:59 |
SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | * connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) Gaétan Lepage doing same time as last week right? (sent an update, Connor yours seems to auto-reject) | 17:09:47 |
connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Huh, I don’t even see anything in my junk mail :/ | 17:31:54 |
connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Two thoughts:
- Helion backend for einops
- Optuna integration with Helion to allow for persistent studies (e.g., if the seed is fixed and the number of generations is increased, the optimization should resume from where it stopped rather than start an entirely new optimization)
| 17:34:43 |
connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Serge I’m working on a matrix of behavior of propagating and consuming setup hooks through packages | 17:36:11 |
SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | I think the key bit is that buildInputs already are (0, 0) away from the current derivation (because we're building for (0, 1)) | 17:59:02 |