| 22 Sep 2024 |
 Sandro š§ | could also be harfbuzz | 19:27:57 |
 FabiƔn Heredia | it is mangohud the cause of the issues | 19:28:22 |
 K900 | Huh | 19:28:45 |
| K900 | That's... very strange | 19:28:51 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | :v huh x2 | 19:28:52 |
| K900 | OH GODDAMMIT | 19:29:19 |
| K900 | You have a 64-bit mangohud in extraPackages32 | 19:29:33 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | Dx | 19:30:02 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | oh right | 19:30:04 |
| K900 | Which means you don't have any of the 32-bit mangohud deps in there | 19:30:06 |
| K900 | But you also don't have a 32-bit mangohud or at least you shouldn't??? | 19:30:17 |
| K900 | But can you see if it's that first | 19:30:24 |
| K900 | And we probably want an assertion | 19:30:37 |
| K900 | To guard that | 19:30:41 |
| K900 | @fabianhjr:matrix.org so if you make it the right bitness does it work | 19:44:15 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | pkgsi686Linux.mangohud? | 19:47:11 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | switching brb | 19:48:10 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | works | 19:50:43 |
| K900 | Fuck me | 19:50:58 |
| K900 | I'm going to sleep | 19:51:10 |
| FabiƔn Heredia | night, thanks for all the help | 19:51:26 |
| K900 | Gonna add an assertion tomorrow | 19:51:30 |
| K900 | So no one else has Fun | 19:51:44 |
 SigmaSquadron | quick, have fun before k900 comes back! | 20:00:05 |
 Atemu | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
But you also don't have a 32-bit mangohud or at least you shouldn't??? 64bit Mangohud includes 32bit Mangohud's layer JSON and thereby the entire closure | 20:30:27 |
| Atemu | It's for supporting both bitnesses of games | 20:30:46 |
| 23 Sep 2024 |
| K900 | In reply to@atemu12:matrix.org
64bit Mangohud includes 32bit Mangohud's layer JSON and thereby the entire closure But how does it explode like that then | 05:54:10 |
| K900 | Also woo can't even do an assertion | 05:57:45 |
| K900 | Because Nvidia doesn't actually have a real 32 bit package | 05:57:57 |
| K900 | It just has a lib32 output on the 64-bit one | 05:58:06 |
