!hzgkCxLtCOTmFXGauj:nixos.org

NixOS Gaming

449 Members
Gaming things, my hands are typing words.127 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
13 Apr 2025
@myned:bjork.techMyned joined the room.00:04:53
@2xsaiko:tchncs.de@2xsaiko:tchncs.de left the room.00:36:15
@mhj:matrix.org@mhj:matrix.org left the room.02:08:21
@philipp:srv.icufeyo changed their profile picture.07:55:46
@philipp:srv.icufeyo changed their profile picture.07:56:52
@zekeriyaoz:matrix.orgmao zedong joined the room.08:20:22
@zekeriyaoz:matrix.orgmao zedong changed their display name from zekeriya öz to nixosfanboy.08:25:13
@zekeriyaoz:matrix.orgmao zedong changed their profile picture.08:26:41
@zekeriyaoz:matrix.orgmao zedong changed their profile picture.08:26:50
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221 joined the room.13:33:43
@niklaskorz:matrix.orgniklaskorzAnyone here using netcup for hosting game servers that also gets error 0x2 on steamcmd app_update?17:32:38
@niklaskorz:matrix.orgniklaskorz Works fine on my local PC 17:32:46
@niklaskorz:matrix.orgniklaskorz It used to work when I pass authentication along when I started getting error 0x2 on anonymous downloads, but now it's the same for authenticated downloads 17:33:18
@niklaskorz:matrix.orgniklaskorz * 17:33:33
@marie:marie.cologneMarieI had that error on a netcup server some time ago, but I don't remember how I fixed it :/17:34:03
@niklaskorz:matrix.orgniklaskorzOk so I'm not imagining things and they might indeed be blocking the netcup subnet? 🫠17:34:25
@marie:marie.cologneMarieIt might be a rate limit thing, I'm not sure17:34:44
14 Apr 2025
@fxomt:tchncs.de@fxomt:tchncs.de left the room.00:59:49
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco K900: This is like the 5th time I've explained the new libgbm / mesa thing and the incompatibility between 24.11 and unstable and the improved compatibility we'll have in 25.05 and onward: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/adding-mesa-from-nixpkgs-unstable-to-a-stable-flake-config/63025/2 06:46:35
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco5th time on discourse that is06:46:51
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoI'm wondering if we need a good changelog and/or nixos manual entry about it06:47:02
@k900:0upti.meK900Should I just write a release note for it or something?06:47:02
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco also should hardware.graphics.package(32) still be hidden since the change? 06:47:24
@k900:0upti.meK900Technically no06:48:47
@k900:0upti.meK900I was kinda hoping to go refactor that mess06:49:03
@k900:0upti.meK900But I guess we can unhide it for now06:49:14
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoYea, I think a release note explaining what happened and what it means going forward, along with unhiding that option, would go a long way to explaining all of this to folks06:50:22
@k900:0upti.meK900 The packaging of Mesa graphics drivers has been significantly reworked, in particular:
  1. applications linked against different Mesa versions than installed on the system should now work correctly going forward (however, applications linked against older Mesa, e.g. from older Nixpkgs releases, remain broken)

  2. the global Mesa version can now be managed without a mass rebuild by setting hardware.graphics.package

  3. packages that used to depend on Mesa for libgbm or libdri should use libgbm or dri-pkgconfig-stub as inputs, respectively

07:51:49
@k900:0upti.meK900 Something like this? @ElvishJerricco 07:51:56
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoThat seems pretty good yea07:52:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10