| 14 Jan 2025 |
 amadaluzia | i personally distaste rec
| 15:21:21 |
| amadaluzia | or if its mkDerivation, just (finalAttrs: {})
| 15:22:02 |
 Greg Hellings | If a derivation test needs a writable tempdir space, what path do I use? | 15:22:52 |
 emily | it's store brand rec with an explicit self reference | 15:23:39 |
 adamcstephens | is the behavior any different in this case? an extra binding just to avoid rec for accessing `version`` | 15:25:51 |
| emily | (probably rec should just have worked like that in the first place, butā¦) | 15:25:56 |
| adamcstephens | * is the behavior any different in this case? an extra binding just to avoid rec for accessing `version`\ | 15:25:58 |
| adamcstephens | * is the behavior any different in this case? an extra binding just to avoid rec for accessing version | 15:26:06 |
 hexa | actual python-modules, the things you can import in a python script, go into the former | 15:29:15 |
|  Sinan (comfy) changed their profile picture. | 15:29:19 |
| hexa | if xonsh uses python packaging but what it ships is not importable, then I don't want it in there | 15:29:37 |
| amadaluzia | fairs, i was looking at repassh and it was both an application and a module? | 15:33:25 |
| amadaluzia | im confused by it | 15:33:28 |
| amadaluzia | https://github.com/dyuri/repassh | 15:33:40 |
| amadaluzia | its some python wrapper which is used in an ssh-agent xontrib made by the same person.....? | 15:34:02 |
| hexa | there is toPythonApplication and toPythonModule to do that conversion | 15:36:44 |
| amadaluzia | ill look into that some time soon | 15:37:39 |
| Greg Hellings | Oh, are we talking about xonsh? | 15:42:23 |
| hexa | the hamming distance between "xonsh" and "xonsh" may lead to that conclusion š¤ | 15:43:15 |
| Greg Hellings | Xonsh is great, but I'm still hoping the xontribs PR can get merged, some day | 15:44:49 |
 adarcy | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
As far as I know we only have builders for x86_64-linux, so those other systems will never completeĀ Huh, I thought I saw some builder for those finish. Is there a way to cancel them to mark the PR ready to be merged ? | 19:29:59 |
| adamcstephens | sounds like aarch64-linux is already happening, or about to happen. | 19:40:21 |
| adamcstephens | no, you can't cancel them. | 19:40:25 |
| adamcstephens | the PR can be merged without them. | 19:40:37 |
| Greg Hellings | We used to have aarch64-linux, at least before the infra shift | 19:42:38 |
| adarcy | Okay, thanks | 19:45:11 |
 misuzu | In reply to @amadaluzia:tchncs.de
https://github.com/dyuri/repassh Isn't this just https://gitlab.com/misuzu/nixos-configuration/-/blob/main/common/ssh.nix?ref_type=heads? | 22:08:14 |
| 15 Jan 2025 |
| amadaluzia | its an unnecessary wrapper over a simple concept | 00:27:39 |
| amadaluzia | though i do wish it was that easy with xonsh | 00:30:13 |
 @rnhmjoj:eurofusion.eu | is lib.inPureEvalMode equivalent to building using flakes? | 08:50:15 |
