Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
12 Jan 2025 | ||
and this behavior was pretty much consistent for the past week on nixpkgs-review 2.x | 19:00:52 | |
* and this behavior was consistent for the past week on nixpkgs-review 2.x | 19:01:09 | |
Am I going insane or is that .devcontainer directory in the nixpkgs root new? | 19:05:28 | |
The committee says it was added three years ago but I really doubt that. | 19:05:52 | |
* | 19:06:21 | |
it doesn't exist in the 24.11 branch, so you doubt is accurate | 19:06:34 | |
* it doesn't exist in the 24.11 branch, so your doubt is accurate | 19:06:38 | |
Oh, looks like it was a three-year old PR merged just an hour ago. | 19:06:44 | |
https://github.com/devcontainers/features/pkgs/container/features%2Fnix 🤔 | 19:16:01 | |
I didn't know this was a thing | 19:16:32 | |
In reply to @niklaskorz:korz.devYou should provide a github token, gh requires it to download eval results unfortunately | 19:18:13 | |
gh is active and working | 19:22:47 | |
I mean obviously it is, otherwise nixpkgs-review post-result would not work | 19:23:17 | |
In reply to @niklaskorz:korz.devI don't mean gh-the-cli, I mean GitHub | 19:24:22 | |
Don't know internals, just try GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token) nixpkgs-review... | 19:25:09 | |
either way, upgraded to 3.0.1 from unstable and it works without issues, so I don't personally care, just wanted to mention it | 19:25:12 | |
I guess there are not that many people reviewing packages while running stable anyhow | 19:27:12 | |
Oh, downloading eval results from GHA was added in 3.0.0, so 2.x is basically broken for newer PRs | 19:30:21 | |
yes, if you scroll up you will see that that's what I said | 19:30:34 | |
^ | 19:30:43 | |
Sorry for the misunderstanding | 19:30:51 | |
no worries 😅 | 19:31:17 | |
it's weird because I always experienced 2.x doing local evals when ofborg hadn't finished | 19:33:09 | |
is it just not able to do that now because of the job getting deleted or something? | 19:33:17 | |
I wish I knew 😬 | 19:41:51 | |
well, it seems okay to backport to me. I don't know how breaking the changes are, but it probably falls under "Services that would fail without up-to-date client software". | 19:55:05 | |
nixpkgs-review is a live service game :) | 19:55:16 | |
I would be in favor of a backport too. The changes are "breaking" in a way as we have made the tool fetch GHA results (instead of Ofborg's). But as emily said, the older version is now obsolete. | 19:56:55 | |
In reply to @niklaskorz:korz.devI'd love to see a Stable team at some point, since this is a common issue and only gets more common later into the release cycle | 23:29:20 | |
* I'd love to see a Stable team at some point to help resolve this, since this is a common issue and only gets more common later into the release cycle | 23:29:30 |